Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person: Panthers would love to try and pry away Matthew Stafford


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

I wonder how Jeremy Chinn ended up on our roster...

The interesting angle is that our new GM is from the team (Seahawks) who traded down with us to get more picks.  So who knows if we take on that trading down philosophy that Seattle has been known for. Hurney  tended to trade up, Seattle tended to trade down.

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stafford has played under 3 head coaches and 4 different OCs during his 12 years in Detroit. Aside from the fact it's a horribly run franchise, 2 seasons with Matt Patricia is like having no head coach at all.

Remember this is the team Barry Sanders retired from at the peak of his career because they wouldn't build a team around him. Megatron also retired in his prime for the same reason. The only thing I blame Stafford for is sticking around as long as he did.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

By offering next years 1st round pick and this years 2nd rounder. 

https://nfltraderumors.co/nfc-notes-eagles-falcons-panthers-3/

If this is the cost for an over the hill Stafford (assuming no Watson) then I'd rather use that draft capital on moving up in the draft for one of the young guys. I have seen enough of Stafford's Jay Cutlerish/Jake Plummer level of mediocrity to know what we would get. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TANTRIC-NINJA said:

If this is the cost for an over the hill Stafford (assuming no Watson) then I'd rather use that draft capital on moving up in the draft for one of the young guys. I have seen enough of Stafford's Jay Cutlerish/Jake Plummer level of mediocrity to know what we would get. 

Donald Trump GIF by reactionseditor

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Madwolf said:

Ah yes, an aging veteran on the wrong side of 30, with an injury history, and declining stats.

Worked out so well for us with Okung, and countless other players, why not give Stafford a try and sink the Franchise 3 years further into the "rebuilding" muck.

Hurney is that you?

No that was Bridgewater that you said was going to be so good

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stafford is if you want to win now with players hitting their prime.

Drafting a QB is if you acknowledge you don't plan on winning for a few years.  This means many moves on the team have been irrelevant.  It means we have to hope we can resign many players of our young core.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...