Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This year's quarterback shuffle...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

...might now include Jared Goff.

Adam Schefter believes there are only around ten truly entrenched starters across the league and is predicting an "unprecedented" offseason for quarterback movement, with as many as eighteen teams or more making changes at that spot.

There was a decent amount of QB movement last year (including our own shift from Cam Newton to Teddy Bridgewater) but it sounds like this year might be even more active.

Gotta figure that includes us again. The question is how and when it happens.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Lol Rams and Eagles are stuck with those qbs with their contracts nobody is taking those on.

The Eagles have indicated they're sticking with Wentz, so it doesn't matter.

People previously floated the possibility of Wentz going to the Colts to rejoin Frank Reich. Now that's a heavily speculated destination for Matt Stafford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these deals seem like better deals for thr clubs trading away then thr clubs trading for. Why the hell would he want Goff if he isn't a free agent? Even then it's filling a space for a year and then do it all over again.

If he was a free agent, ok. Its an option if we fail elsewhere. Trading for him? Hell no to him and his contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We used to talk about members of the hundred million dollar quarterback club having no Super Bowl victories. From what I know, they still don't have much to speak of.

Teams are spending ridiculous amounts of money on the quarterback spot and not getting an ideal return on investment.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Terrible business decision.  Lazy negotiating.  
    • I think GM's are more upset than owners Owners spend the same amount of money every year as it's a hard cap with a floor minimum too.  It doesn't really change anything for them (other than possibly make things more difficult on the team in general). But it's the GM's who need to negotiate these contracts who are really going to be pissed, if you're a skill position player that goes in the 2nd round now, you're going to be asking for this, and the higher you're drafted and/or the more unexpected it was for you to not go in the 1st, the stronger your case will be to insist on it.
    • 1 main reason i LOVE this move is because how many times did we see the Rivera or Fox era play older guys who honestly shouldn't have been on the field only to be put there for seniority. Holding a younger guy back from developing and stifling their progression!    This shows me DM is saying fug that! Lets get these young talented guys reps and ready to fn roll!  Coker was great example of that last year trading Johnson mid season.  Having a GM who was also a player i think helps with that mindset. Understanding father time is undefeated and you have to go with younger, faster players even when they don't have a ton of experience.  Love it and each move DM is doing this offseason is getting me to forget how much i hate our owner and back to feeling good about this team. Lets sign a Safety and rock this division this year!
×
×
  • Create New...