Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bieniemy apparently out of the running in Houston

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ImaginaryKev Grand Master

ImaginaryKev

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Bieniemy has consistently failed to impress when interviewing for Head Coaching jobs.

When you consider his paper thin resume, maybe he's just a shitty candidate?

You have no way of knowing this seeing as you only have conflicting internet sources to verify this. Plus, your comments about his lack of a resume is utter horseshit. Hit dogs holler. 

Edited by ImaginaryKev
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, CRA said:

If only Bienemy could of laid out a detailed plan.   Organizations like detailed, OCD, analytical type guys. 

we’re going to kick you in the teeth, all right, and when you punch us back, we’re going to smile at you and when you knock us down, we’re going to get up, and on the way up, we’re going to bite a knee cap off. And we’re going to stand up and then it’s going to take two more shots to knock us down. And on the way up, we’re going to take your other kneecap, and we’re going to get up and then it’s going to take three shots to get us down. And when we do, we’re going to take another hunk out of you. Before long, we’re going to be the last one standing. That’s going to be the mentality.”

If the guy running your coaching search is someone like David Tepper, that answer gets you a "thank you for coming".

If it's being run by Chris Spielman though, "Hell yeah! You're hired!"

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Bieniemy has consistently failed to impress when interviewing for Head Coaching jobs.

When you consider his paper thin resume, maybe he's just a shitty candidate?

His resumé isn't "paper thin". Hell, he's associated with one of the best offenses in the league right now.

It is valid that he might be overshadowed by Andy Reid though.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've seen suggestions from more than one source that he's not very good at interviewing.

There were (unverified) reports that his interview with the Panthers was a disaster.

Not only this but I believe he has a history with some red flags.

As far as the job not being appealing due to Watson, I don’t believe this. Getting rid of Watson and possibly Watt gives Texans a ton of capital for a rebuild. We’re talking 4+ first rounders.

Could be he doesn’t want to be a part of a rebuild but that does appeal to a lot of coaches.

Could also be he doesn’t want to deal with that FO.

If he did take himself out of consideration that definitely says something because he’s been wanting this position for a long time, you’d have to think it’d take a hell of a lot for him to forego an opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ImaginaryKev Grand Master

ImaginaryKev

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Paper thin resume? What in the world?

Literally everyone else in this thread can admit race is a hurdle for qualified coaches like Eric B, Oldham doesn't wanna reckon with that so he poos my posts acknowledging it and makes up stuff to justify his opinion. It's anyone's guess why he's being so defensive about it, the conversation was going well til he showed up. 

Edited by ImaginaryKev
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Paper thin resume? What in the world?

he was coaching in the NFL....when the new Lions HC was still playing in the NFL. 

man, the Lions suck.   Always good to know the Panthers will never be the worst. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
Just now, onmyown said:

Not only this but I believe he has a history with some red flags.

As far as the job not being appealing due to Watson, I don’t believe this. Getting rid of Watson and possibly Watt gives Texans a ton of capital for a rebuild. We’re talking 4+ first rounders.

Could be he doesn’t want to be a part of a rebuild but that does appeal to a lot of coaches.

Could also be he doesn’t want to deal with that FO.

If he did take himself out of consideration that definitely says something because he’s been wanting this position for a long time, you’d have to think it’d take a hell of a lot for him to forego an opportunity.

Houston is a great opportunity to fail. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...