Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person - The Athletic - Panthers not interested in any senior bowl QBs


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Coaches spent all week talking about how good Jones and the other QBs were, then after the game they're like... nah, we're not hot on any of them being first rounders.

We'll have Jones in the first or the second.

"Now Mac, that ankle looks pretty bad to me. Maybe you'd better sit this thing out."

"Nah, Coach Rhule, I'm fine. Look I can run, I can pivot, I can push off and I can plant, no problem."

"Mac, just sit there, look disappointed and try to look like an optimistic bust every time the camera pans to you."

"And with the eighth pick of the 2021 NFL draft, the Panthers pick Mac Jones, QB, Alabama."

"Told ya kid, we'd take care of you."

Pin on Casey affleck

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Just like at any other level of football, you do what it takes to win, and running down someone's throat is preferable every single time!

Stop with the bullshit narrative about people getting defensive. It's not true. Lance is just a prospect like all the other ones. He will get his knocks just like everyone else not named Trevor. Analysis and criticism are all a part of the process, but you seem to take offense every time someone points out counterarguments to prospects that you don't want. Your go-to argument is that some message boarders are being "defensive", but you're the one who is low-key getting the attitude. I'll say what I said the last time you accused me of being defensive: Some of you are going to rue the day that you talked poo about Trey Lance. And, I stand behind what I said. If he busts, I'll be the first to admit it. But, when he turns out to be special, I won't even have to say "I told you so", because you'll know.

For the record, I'll be content to get a potential starter. Sure, I think Lance has the highest upside, and I doubt that he's going to bust, but if we pick Wilson, Fields, or even Jones, I will trust that Rhule and company know what they're looking for and be hopeful that it all works out. Even if we don't pick a QB, I know that we will acquire one relatively soon (before Teddy's contract is up). 

You are being ultra sensitive today. You literally made up a fake argument where I said Trey Lance can’t throw. Going to rue the day we critiqued Trey Lance? What kind of idiocy is that? Is he going to hurt me or my family? Are you? What a joke lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Varking said:

You are being ultra sensitive today. You literally made up a fake argument where I said Trey Lance can’t throw. Going to rue the day we critiqued Trey Lance? What kind of idiocy is that? Is he going to hurt me or my family? Are you? What a joke lol

Your modus operandi is tiresome and tired! You have already said that you didn't want Lance. Yes, you have! You've also said that his coaches "limited" his throws and "avoided" throwing the ball, intimating that Lance was the issue! You've made a dishonest and/or disingenuous leap based solely upon Lance's lack of throws (as you see it)! Every time I counter your bullshit, you accused me of being sensitive or defensive (which is ludicrous, I might add) when it's you who are the one being sensitive. Chill out a little bit! Don't be so sensitive when someone counters your argument!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Your modus operandi is tiresome and tired! You have already said that you didn't want Lance. Yes, you have! You've also said that his coaches "limited" his throws and "avoided" throwing the ball, intimating that Lance was the issue! You've made a dishonest and/or disingenuous leap based solely upon Lance's lack of throws (as you see it)! Every time I counter your bullshit, you accused me of being sensitive or defensive (which is ludicrous, I might add) when it's you who are the one being sensitive. Chill out a little bit! Don't be so sensitive when someone counters your argument!

You haven’t countered anything I’ve written. Something is going on with you today. I have said I didn’t want Lance. That’s correct. I’ve never claimed I didn’t say that. This is the case of you making up arguments I’m not making. He’s not my first choice. I’ve also said I completely understand why the Panthers would take him. YES I HAVE!! I’ve also said I’d support him if he was the pick. YES I HAVE!!

 

I hope your day gets better. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I hope Joe is right here, Rhule is a lair and this could be one of his lies.

 

@Varking how DARE you say the lord and savior Trey"18 times superbowl MVP" lance can't throw, shame on YOUU!!1!1!!!

He came out of the woodworks with tears already in his eyes and has gotten super offended over my opinion. I didn’t even say he couldn’t throw. I pointed out he is thousands of reps and reads behind these other guys and it’s going to take him time to get it. This triggered something deep in his soul. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

You haven’t countered anything I’ve written. Something is going on with you today. I have said I didn’t want Lance. That’s correct. I’ve never claimed I didn’t say that. This is the case of you making up arguments I’m not making. He’s not my first choice. I’ve also said I completely understand why the Panthers would take him. YES I HAVE!! I’ve also said I’d support him if he was the pick. YES I HAVE!!

 

I hope your day gets better. 
 

 

Like I said: I reject your boom-or-bust narrative in regards to Lance! I reject your intimations that coaches purposefully limited his throws! Moreover, if you "don't want Lance", he's obviously not your first choice or any choice, do don't try and hedge now.  Live by what you said!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

He came out of the woodworks with tears already in his eyes and has gotten super offended over my opinion. I didn’t even say he couldn’t throw. I pointed out he is thousands of reps and reads behind these other guys and it’s going to take him time to get it. This triggered something deep in his soul. 

Your deflection is ludicrous! You're a pretty bad comic or just delusional if you actually believe that I am offended by a disagreement of opinion about a football player or football team. I reject your boom-or-bust narrative in reference to Lance, period! Sorry (not sorry) you don't like that! 

I hope your night gets better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Like I said: I reject your boom-or-bust narrative in regards to Lance! I reject your intimations that coaches purposefully limited his throws! Moreover, if you "don't want Lance", he's obviously not your first choice or any choice, do don't try and hedge now.  Live by what you said!

I’ve literally told you what I’ve said. And I stand by it. I don’t want him. That doesn’t mean I can’t see why he’s coveted. It doesn’t mean I wouldn’t cheer for him. You’re the one dramatizing this whole thing. “YE SHALL RUE THE DAY!!!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Your deflection is ludicrous! You're a pretty bad comic or just delusional if you actually believe that I am offended by a disagreement of opinion about a football player or football team. I reject your boom-or-bust narrative in reference to Lance, period! Sorry (not sorry) you don't like that! 

I hope your night gets better.

You have such sad eyes lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

I’ve literally told you what I’ve said. And I stand by it. I don’t want him. That doesn’t mean I can’t see why he’s coveted. It doesn’t mean I wouldn’t cheer for him. You’re the one dramatizing this whole thing. “YE SHALL RUE THE DAY!!!”

Well, that really was dramatic! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...