Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Brugler of the Athletic Mock: Panthers trade up to 3 for Fields

Captain Morgan

By Captain Morgan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
Just now, Varking said:

It’s about having more chances to get “your guy”. There’s no guarantee that he’s going to be a success but again… we were one pick away from Herbert and we heavily scouted him. We would be set at the QB position and could focus elsewhere. I also believe Okudah is going to be fine. He played this season on a horrible defense and when he played he was hurt. Imagine this year if 4 QBs go in the top of the draft before we pick. Then two years in a row we would have lost out on potential franchise QBs off a late season win. 
 

It’s pointless to argue about fans wanting C or Z player in the draft. Do you believe Brown was the Panthers guy this past draft? No. They settled for him because other guys like Burrow, Herbert and Chase Young were off the board. We need our franchise quarterback. We have sucked consistently for far too long. 

The draft in retrospect is consistently a walk of could'ves, would'ves, and should'ves.

If Brown wasn't one of "the guys," the team would have moved up to take somebody else. If Herbert was that player, they'd have moved up for him. The fact that they stayed put showed that they were comfortable with how the board ended up. We know this to be the case because this was exactly what was done with Greg Little.

The top 4 QBs in the draft prior to last were Kyler Murray, Daniel Jones, Dwayne Haskins, and Drew Lock. Just because the player plays at a position that the team could use an upgrade it does not mean that player is worth a top 5 pick. We have re-drafts all of the time showing this.

Again, the idea that a team should have lost the Washington game last season to make sure they got the #3 pick is stupid considering the true cost that would require and the fact that any of the other W's could have been L's. There isn't any amount of spreadsheet adjusting that can be done to change that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're not understanding the concept. Draft pick value is real. That is real team building capital. You can make the picks, you can trade the picks, more draft capital means more options. What you're arguing is like saying that you'd just as well rather have less money in the bank because there's a chance you'll piss it all away anyway so why bother? It's just not an intelligent argument to make.

You keep saying that folks don't understand the concept, but in actuality that's you bby. Everyone understands that draft selections are assigned values and that the higher picks have greater value because in theory, you'll be selecting the best player available for your team. Nobody has debated this, yet you keep going back to it as if it's the final answer when it isn't.

What exactly makes those draft picks valuable? Aside from getting in new talent, there's the salary cap implications as well as an attempt at competitive balance. What makes a draft pick a bust? If they do not pan out. Therefore, each of those selections is essentially a spot in line to gamble. This is why the attempt at quantification falls flat, because you have no idea what the final value is going to be in the player that you exchanged that draft pick for. By it's very nature, the draft is not a surefire thing. Therefore, the idea that the team should purposefully lose a game for selections that all 32 teams value differently is illogical and if acted upon harmful.

You can keep repeating your point without ever considering another, but that's doesn't make it logical.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Icege said:

You keep saying that folks don't understand the concept, but in actuality that's you bby. Everyone understands that draft selections are assigned values and that the higher picks have greater value because in theory, you'll be selecting the best player available for your team. Nobody has debated this, yet you keep going back to it as if it's the final answer when it isn't.

What exactly makes those draft picks valuable? Aside from getting in new talent, there's the salary cap implications as well as an attempt at competitive balance. What makes a draft pick a bust? If they do not pan out. Therefore, each of those selections is essentially a spot in line to gamble. This is why the attempt at quantification falls flat, because you have no idea what the final value is going to be in the player that you exchanged that draft pick for. By it's very nature, the draft is not a surefire thing. Therefore, the idea that the team should purposefully lose a game for selections that all 32 teams value differently is illogical and if acted upon harmful.

You can keep repeating your point without ever considering another, but that's doesn't make it logical.

 

You can't be this dense. The value of the DRAFT PICK is not altered by the PLAYER that is selected at that spot. The draft pick value is the draft pick value. If you have a Hurney who botches it that doesn't make the pick itself any less valuable. By your logic, we should be trading all of our picks straight up for lower picks because hell, we might draft a bust anyway so let's lessen our cap exposure. 

The reason I'm not considering your point is because it's without merit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Icege said:

The draft in retrospect is consistently a walk of could'ves, would'ves, and should'ves.

If Brown wasn't one of "the guys," the team would have moved up to take somebody else. If Herbert was that player, they'd have moved up for him. The fact that they stayed put showed that they were comfortable with how the board ended up. We know this to be the case because this was exactly what was done with Greg Little.

The top 4 QBs in the draft prior to last were Kyler Murray, Daniel Jones, Dwayne Haskins, and Drew Lock. Just because the player plays at a position that the team could use an upgrade it does not mean that player is worth a top 5 pick. We have re-drafts all of the time showing this.

Again, the idea that a team should have lost the Washington game last season to make sure they got the #3 pick is stupid considering the true cost that would require and the fact that any of the other W's could have been L's. There isn't any amount of spreadsheet adjusting that can be done to change that.

Again, going to disagree respectfully. Not going to call you or your ideas stupid. Just going to say I disagree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      BREAKING: Panthers interested in Justin Simmons

      By Basbear · Posted

      I mean the whole defense was trash, he was at least trying. Besides if you put a all-pro among 10 PSers, that all-world will look human. It's very hard to judge very bad units and find the best players among them. Horn and Mjack played well too, there was 0 pass rush and -1777784 run defense. 
    • Basbear
      Getting an early start this year...

      By Basbear · Posted

      I was looking back and seen Evan Neal has made the switch to OG after awful years at OT.......I wanted him over Icky for his tricep alone..... I was 100% stroud too, I was super pissed about his record setting and playoff leading start......I had arich vastly over the midget BY too. But right now, BY is about the only one on the up&up. The Texans used lots of prime draft capital to help Stroud.  It's still not ready. But if you're honestly about past drafts, these GMs are not alone in making mistakes.  I still feel they should stayed put and allowed Carter to fall in their lap, but best I know Tepper had the worst rage about landing a QB for the past 5 years. The deal is with the correct coaching staff, Baker or darnold would still be here....Baker has signed 3 years for 100 million, which is a great NFL QB contract. Tepper hiring rhule and his shitty Baylor/temple staff was a massive setback given rhule was in control too. Then panic set in an d fitteerererererer had to make a winner and find a QB. Ugh.....I hope they are back... 
    • Basbear
      Jaire Alexander Released

      By Basbear · Posted

      Also maybe the biggest part is his fromer college buddy, Lord Lamar told the GM to sign him. It was done nearly right after and guess who was the first person Alexander met at ravens stadium?? 
×
×
  • Create New...