Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston released


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Untouchable said:

I'm almost positive it is not what they want from their FS so someone else is going to have to fill that role.  I know Robinson was drafted with that deep safety role in mind, but lots of young competition there in that last line of defense.

Snow mentioned wanting Chinn playing as more of a safety going forward than a LB playing back like he did this season, so him as one of the starting safety makes sense.

Can I use this post to start the Marcus Mage train because I fuging would kill for us to pursue Marcus Maye

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

You mean all of the UNC fan boys.

I'm a self admitted UNC fan boy and I've always recognized that Boston is not a starting caliber NFL safety. Some college fans just can't separate the college game and the NFL game and I mean that both ways. They'll either want a guy solely because he played at a certain school or they'll trash a guy solely because he played at a certain school and it cracks me up because neither can recognize their bias while vigorously finger pointing at the other group.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm a self admitted UNC fan boy and I've always recognized that Boston is not a starting caliber NFL safety. Some college fans just can't separate the college game and the NFL game and I mean that both ways. They'll either want a guy solely because he played at a certain school or they'll trash a guy solely because he played at a certain school and it cracks me up because neither can recognize their bias while vigorously finger pointing at the other group.

My brother and my son are UNC grads and they think Boston is a great safety. I am sure they will be crushed over this move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm a self admitted UNC fan boy and I've always recognized that Boston is not a starting caliber NFL safety. Some college fans just can't separate the college game and the NFL game and I mean that both ways. They'll either want a guy solely because he played at a certain school or they'll trash a guy solely because he played at a certain school and it cracks me up because neither can recognize their bias while vigorously finger pointing at the other group.

May not be the place but what's your take on Suratt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthera onca said:

My brother and my son are UNC grads and they think Boston is a great safety. I am sure they will be crushed over this move.

Yikes. He's still the same guy he was at UNC. An inconsistent player who can make some splash plays but makes more mistakes than good plays. He takes terrible angles and basically plays like a 4.5 guy who thinks he's a 4.3 guy. He isn't slow, he just thinks he's a lot faster than he actually is.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Yikes. He's still the same guy he was at UNC. An inconsistent player who can make some splash plays but makes more mistakes than good plays. He takes terrible angles and basically plays like a 4.5 guy who thinks he's a 4.3 guy. He isn't slow, he just thinks he's a lot faster than he actually is.

Marty and Ron always seemed to overvalue those type of guys.

(see: Godfrey, Charles; Reid, Eric)

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rags said:

May not be the place but what's your take on Suratt?

I think he has a ton of potential. Gotta remember, he literally only has two years of experience playing defense at all. I do think he'll require a year or two of NFL experience and some patience to see what he'll become because of that though. He's going to get stuck on a lot of blocks and get caught up on the wash on a lot of plays early on in the NFL. But he definitely has the instincts and measurables to be a very good modern day NFL LB. I was somewhat disappointed he didn't make a leap forward this year after a year of playing MLB and I have to admit that I'm somewhat concerned that his backup who had minimal playing experience prior to the bowl game looked very good in his spot against a TAMU team that arguably should've been in the playoffs. Very surprisingly, missing Surratt didn't seem to have a negative impact at all for a defense that honestly wasn't very good. In my book that's a pretty big red flag for a guy who was basically the QB of the D. I honestly expected the D to look like trash without him and that wasn't the case at all. They competed well before they gassed out late. 

It was the opposite of Sam Howell who still looked like a stud despite missing both RBs and his #1 WR.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...