Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Love him or hate him....he's spot on. Steve Smith


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know we have to address the offensive line but putting a defense that contain some of these high powered offenses should be a priority.

I think we'll address the O-line in free agency and maybe one or two defensive players.  

If we get Watson and can have a stellar defense we can go back to our rightful spot at the top of the division. 

Steve Smith, IMO, hits it right on the head about our dream scenario. 

https://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-total-access-dream-trades-signings-for-nfc-south

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's right once he moves past the Watson fantasy. 

And I harped on this a lot last season: if we could have made some of our opponents punt even once in a number of our games, we would have had a winning season, potentially even the play offs. Our defense just could not get the opponents off the field.

If you can't get your opponent off the field on third down, then you are done for. We were unable to do it on an epic scale. There were games where are best defensive option was to literally let the other team march down the field and hope to hold them to a field goal.

And yet, we still were within one score of winning most of our losses. I mean, do the math. 

We had the personnel to do it. Our defense shut out the Lions, which isn't saying much, but was also able to give Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs fits. We played aggressive defense in those games, but spent the rest of them playing like a bunch of old ladies. 

We need o-line, but Steve Smith is right, we need someone incredible manning that MLB position, calling the plays, reading the offense and holding us to an aggressive defensive attitude. Drafting this year should pay particular attention to the guys who get the green sticker on their helmets. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

He's right once he moves past the Watson fantasy. 

And I harped on this a lot last season: if we could have made some of our opponents punt even once in a number of our games, we would have had a winning season, potentially even the play offs. Our defense just could not get the opponents off the field.

If you can't get your opponent off the field on third down, then you are done for. We were unable to do it on an epic scale. There were games where are best defensive option was to literally let the other team march down the field and hope to hold them to a field goal.

And yet, we still were within one score of winning most of our losses. I mean, do the math. 

We had the personnel to do it. Our defense shut out the Lions, which isn't saying much, but was also able to give Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs fits. We played aggressive defense in those games, but spent the rest of them playing like a bunch of old ladies. 

We need o-line, but Steve Smith is right, we need someone incredible manning that MLB position, calling the plays, reading the offense and holding us to an aggressive defensive attitude. Drafting this year should pay particular attention to the guys who get the green sticker on their helmets. 

Remember it was a tale of two halves, as well. The first half of the season the offense was seemingly playing well but our defense couldn't stop anyone. Then in the second half of the season our defense improved while our offense kept shitting the bed in crunch time(and we all know who was largely responsible for that).

The defense absolutely has to be improved but I will say I think the D is a lot further along in development than the offense is, at the moment. 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Remember it was a tale of two halves, as well. The first half of the season the offense was seemingly playing well but our defense couldn't stop anyone. Then in the second half of the season our defense improved while our offense kept shitting the bed in crunch time(and we all know who was largely responsible for that).

The defense absolutely has to be improved but I will say I think the D is a lot further along in development than the offense is, at the moment. 

The defense did not improve. Ya they played a good game vs. the horrible Lions and WFT. But otherwise they struggled to even force a punt.

As a unit perhaps they will do better this season but I remain firm they do not have the proper coaching to improve to elite NFL status.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

The defense did not improve. Ya they played a good game vs. the horrible Lions and WFT. But otherwise they struggled to even force a punt.

As a unit perhaps they will do better this season but I remain firm they do not have the proper coaching to improve to elite NFL status.

They really need a 3 down guy at KK's spot and a good linebacker.

This is one of the first times in our team's history where we are witnessing what happens with bad linebacker play.  You don't force 3 and outs and you're not setting the offense up for easy points.  Smitty is right in the video (he's his rambling self) but a DT+LB combined with a QB is the shot in the arm we need.  The remainder of our resources go to the OL and finding another CB.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time there's a Super Bowl, some definitive statement is made. While there is some truth to the statements, it's not as cut-and-dried as "must have an overpowering defense" or " must have a great offense".

Tampa Bay won this year's SB (not without controversy). They were a well-rounded team and had a great game plan for a less-than-healthy KC team. So, now everyone's on the "must have an overpowering defense" bandwagon.

But wait, didn't KC win the SB the year before? No one would mistake KCs defense for Tampa Bay's, so...what happened there?

The key to winning a Super Bowl is to have a balanced team. If not, then you need something exceptional to make up for the lack of balance (like a Mahomes). And remember, the Super Bowl is just ONE game. If KC had been healthy, what would that game have been like?

I love Smitty, but exactly how many Super Bowls have either Fox or Rivera won?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Raleigh PF said:

Every time there's a Super Bowl, some definitive statement is made. While there is some truth to the statements, it's not as cut-and-dried as "must have an overpowering defense" or " must have a great offense".

Tampa Bay won this year's SB (not without controversy). They were a well-rounded team and had a great game plan for a less-than-healthy KC team. So, now everyone's on the "must have an overpowering defense" bandwagon.

But wait, didn't KC win the SB the year before? No one would mistake KCs defense for Tampa Bay's, so...what happened there?

The key to winning a Super Bowl is to have a balanced team. If not, then you need something exceptional to make up for the lack of balance (like a Mahomes). And remember, the Super Bowl is just ONE game. If KC had been healthy, what would that game have been like?

I love Smitty, but exactly how many Super Bowls have either Fox or Rivera won?

And the entire contingent of refs in your pocket. Don't forget about that. Thats a pretty big deal too.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

The defense did not improve. Ya they played a good game vs. the horrible Lions and WFT. But otherwise they struggled to even force a punt.

As a unit perhaps they will do better this season but I remain firm they do not have the proper coaching to improve to elite NFL status.

The Green Bay game we forced them to punt 4 times in a row.  Something no other team did against the Packers all season.  

The defense was by far better the second half than the first. 

Offensively, teams locked down the short game and forced TB to throw deep which he couldn't do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Those are thr biggest needs. There are a lot of places we could improve but those 3 are key.

I mean, we don't have a single NFL LB on the roster other than Shaq. When Samuel moves on, we will no longer have a starting caliber slot WR. We need another starting DT, we need a TE, we could use an upgrade from Burris at S, we need DE depth, we need just about every position on the field in terms of backups. 

I am not sure there is a single position group that we are solid into the two deep. We played well last year compared to our talent level but make no mistake, this is still one of the least talented rosters in the NFL. We have to move in the right direction this offseason in terms of fixing that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...