Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A new fire to the Watson drama (per Jason la Canfora)


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

Exactly. And we have folks getting mad about the Panthers getting involved in this madness. To me, it’s been the most exciting off season I can remember. But alas, can’t please some folks. 

Hell yeah!  At least we have something fun to talk about!  I can only read so many write ups on the strengths and weaknesses of the first round QBs.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...Don't necessarily think this means anything with regard to Watson.

Can however say I'm not real happy about anybody in our organization having a friendship with Jack Easterby though, especially somebody high up.

(Easterby should be avoided like the plague)

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah...Don't necessarily think this means anything with regard to Watson.

Can however say I'm not real happy about anybody in our organization having a friendship with Jack Easterby though, especially somebody high up.

(Easterby should be avoided like the plague)

Bow chic a bow woww

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love to be able to talk about something that could be very exciting here. Number of threads don't matter. If you are tired of them don't open them. This is a lot better than most seasons when we talk about. We have no cash. We will have to look at the bottom of the bin on free agents. This to me is exciting off season to talk about. We may not have another one for a while. Enjoy it!

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah...Don't necessarily think this means anything with regard to Watson.

Can however say I'm not real happy about anybody in our organization having a friendship with Jack Easterby though, especially somebody high up.

(Easterby should be avoided like the plague)

Lol..Relax. Easterby shouldn’t have the job he has, but that doesn’t make his poor choices contagious.
 

Besides, Cal is responsible for Easterby. Easterby is just doing what he can with his extremely limited skill set and perspective.

I’m sure we’re all friends with lots of people who would make terrible football execs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Without reading through the thread, isn't Drummond in our PR department?  Meaning he has no influence on personnel?

Drummond just got promoted to prevent Houston from hiring him as their team president. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah...Don't necessarily think this means anything with regard to Watson.

Can however say I'm not real happy about anybody in our organization having a friendship with Jack Easterby though, especially somebody high up.

(Easterby should be avoided like the plague)

Hey it’s Debbie Downer post #1000.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • You're right. And he's been on the upswing, something that's been a long time coming. And over the last few years, we woulda been better with a Trent Dilfer out there considering everything.  But right now, we got a W following a W the week before. It has been a while since we've been there. And we're at .500. I know that's only a C grade right now, but man, after so many F grades in a row... it's kinda refreshing to be here. Is Bryce a long term answer here? He's still got a long way to go. Could he do it? Those three touchdown passes he made were bang on, high performance throws. And they finally game planned him pushing the ball down field. It was against a weak Dallas defense, but at least they were running a game based on attacking weaknesses of the defense rather than covering the weaknesses of our own team. Maybe both Canales and Young are maturing before our eyes.
    • No, he got beat at home by Michigan this year.  The other five wins are against Big Ten and Non-Power bottom feeders.  He's 0-7 vs ranked teams, and each year Nebraska has started strong and then faded in conference play.  Nebraska is 1-7 in two Novembers under Rhule.  This year their November slate is USC, @UCLA, @Penn State and Iowa.  Very possible they lose all of those games.  His tenure at Nebraska is looking very Baylor-esque.  And somehow he's still a front runner for the Penn State job.  Which would be ironic since they just ran a very Matt Rhule like (as far as can't beat any good teams) James Franklin out of town. 
    • GWDs vs... HOU: 15 - 13, no turnovers ATL: 9 - 7, no turnovers NO: 23 - 22, 1 interception NYG: 20 - 17, no turnovers ARI: 36 - 30, no turnovers @ATL: 44 - 38, no turnovers MIA: 27 - 24, 1 interception + 1 fumble DAL: 30 - 27, 1 interception (that was clearly TMac's fault) Which one of those games was Bryce clearly the reason that the team was behind aside from Miami?
×
×
  • Create New...