Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: 49ers called Panthers about Teddy Bridgewater

WarPanthers89

By WarPanthers89,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Your problem is that someone told you about that 0-8, and you think it's a bible verse. What makes you think that any other quarterback will have the Panthers in those competitive situations. Some of you are willing to pay a kings ransom in an attempt to upgrade the quarterback position. If Teddy was so bad, why would it take so much to get better than him? 

Teddy sucked on third downs, when u 8 yds he throws it for 3 yds, need 5 yds throws for one yard, I mean how many more examples can I give you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Your problem is that someone told you about that 0-8, and you think it's a bible verse. What makes you think that any other quarterback will have the Panthers in those competitive situations. Some of you are willing to pay a kings ransom in an attempt to upgrade the quarterback position. If Teddy was so bad, why would it take so much to get better than him? 

Precisely because there is such a gap between the good QBs and the others. An elite QB does not guarantee success in and of themselves but there's no question that offensive dynamics and flexibility are a major advantage in overcoming other team weaknesses.

9 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

In Minnesota, and in New Orleans, Teddy won. What happened here? 

They won despite his limitations via the supporting cast. That's always been the book on Teddy and non-dynamic QBs like that - can win a few games with loads of talent around them and perhaps the occasional Super Bowl with transcendent defenses but aren't good enough to elevate a team and overcome top-tier competition when it's on them to do so. Offensive football runs through the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Breakpoint4510 Newbie

Breakpoint4510

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Where have I said that type of move was the only way?

It's what you want to do. You want style over substance. Teddy Bridgewater is not the worst quarterback in the league. As a matter of fact Teddy went from the top of the league in some categories to the middle. To want to blow up the team just to get rid of a player that only have two years left smells personal or just plain dumb.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfo89 Rising Star

jfo89

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

It's what you want to do. You want style over substance. Teddy Bridgewater is not the worst quarterback in the league. As a matter of fact Teddy went from the top of the league in some categories to the middle. To want to blow up the team just to get rid of a player that only have two years left smells personal or just plain dumb.

I personally wont be watching if Teddy is the starter next year. 

 

I cant watch him take another sack on 4th down with the game on the line, or throw the ball to the LOS on 3rd and 8.

 

The team was a lot better than we thought it was going to be last year. Just good enough to give the fans some hope, but Teddy is the hope crusher. He plays scared.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

It's what you want to do. You want style over substance. Teddy Bridgewater is not the worst quarterback in the league. As a matter of fact Teddy went from the top of the league in some categories to the middle. To want to blow up the team just to get rid of a player that only have two years left smells personal or just plain dumb.

Others perhaps but I've never said it's what I want to see happen. In fact, I've said many times that I trust the staff/FO to improve the QB position and team overall however they determine the best path forward. If it's selling the farm then so be it, and if it's through acquisition of a vet/developing of drafting a rookie then that's their call. This staff and FO is still an unknown but at this point they seem to recognize the need for a more dynamic QB. I think as a fanbase though the dropoff from a Cam Newton to Teddy has made the deficiency that much more apparent and folks might be a bit knee-jerk. Cam wasn't a completion machine but he was dynamic and a playmaker.

I've also not said Teddy's the worst QB in the league, but he's clearly a lower-tier starter at best and after almost 50 starts is what he is. I've no idea what categories you're referring to with the 'top of the league' comment, but if it's his 2019 numbers the stats were exactly the same with the exception of an outlier 4 TD game against an atrocious Tampa Bay pass defense where nearly 1/2 of his passing yards were YAC. Some yards, lots of short completions, few TDs, and an offense carried by the talent around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

It's what you want to do. You want style over substance. Teddy Bridgewater is not the worst quarterback in the league. As a matter of fact Teddy went from the top of the league in some categories to the middle. To want to blow up the team just to get rid of a player that only have two years left smells personal or just plain dumb.

If you can’t win a game less than one score 0-8 by the way and can even try to throw for first down on 4th and 9 with game on the line it’s personal.

Reaction GIF by MOODMAN

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Your problem is that someone told you about that 0-8, and you think it's a bible verse. What makes you think that any other quarterback will have the Panthers in those competitive situations. Some of you are willing to pay a kings ransom in an attempt to upgrade the quarterback position. If Teddy was so bad, why would it take so much to get better than him? 

Sorry facts are a problem for you...0-8

But reality is any Avg QB giving 8 opportunities to make a game winning or tying drive.. Will Win Atleast 1 of those games.. Even a below avg. QB giving that many opportunities will luck into Atleast setting the team up with a short FG.. 

I'm also very sorry that 15tds and 11ints aren't considered a good season  by most ppl who watch football...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, KSpan said:

Others perhaps but I've never said it's what I want to see happen. In fact, I've said many times that I trust the staff/FO to improve the QB position and team overall however they determine the best path forward. If it's selling the farm then so be it, and if it's through acquisition of a vet/developing of drafting a rookie then that's their call. This staff and FO is still an unknown but at this point they seem to recognize the need for a more dynamic QB. I think as a fanbase though the dropoff from a Cam Newton to Teddy has made the deficiency that much more apparent and folks might be a bit knee-jerk. Cam wasn't a completion machine but he was dynamic and a playmaker.

I've also not said Teddy's the worst QB in the league, but he's clearly a lower-tier starter at best and after almost 50 starts is what he is. I've no idea what categories you're referring to with the 'top of the league' comment, but if it's his 2019 numbers the stats were exactly the same with the exception of an outlier 4 TD game against an atrocious Tampa Bay pass defense where nearly 1/2 of his passing yards were YAC. Some yards, lots of short completions, few TDs, and an offense carried by the talent around him.

I just think that this fanbase has grown up and after having a Cam even a Jake Delhome.. Can see what good QB play looks like even if they have Byron Bell and Nate Chandler at OT and no weapons surrounding them.. Look at Cam numbers that season..  Now compare them to Teddy's last season..  We don't have to accept bad QB play ..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

I just think that this fanbase has grown up and after having a Cam even a Jake Delhome.. Can see what good QB play looks like even if they have Byron Bell and Nate Chandler at OT and no weapons surrounding them.. Look at Cam numbers that season..  Now compare them to Teddy's last season..  We don't have to accept bad QB play ..

Precisely

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Steves89
      The "now it's been three years" Grade for the 2023 Draft

      By Steves89 · Posted

      Didn't  see this posted (since 2023) but since folks have been posting that you can't judge a draft class for three years (a ridiculous take), I thought I'd post this to see what people thought about the 2023 draft. Unfortunately this may not be the most interesting class to do this with but I do quite like retrospective draft grades. Would appreciate other's takes on this (and other recent) draft classes.   1(1) - Bryce Young QB: I am a bigger Bryce Young apologist than most (maybe all). I like the kid. But there is no way around it: This was a terrible pick. If he had been picked in the 4th or even the 3rd round I would feel pretty good about it. But this was the first overall pick that we gave up two firsts, our best offensive player to get.  GRADE: C -    2(39) - Jonathan Mingo WR: not much to say here here. He was here for two years. His yards per catch are on par with Bryce's yards per pass. Rough stuff. To date he has still never scored a touchdown in the NFL GRADE: F   3(80) - DJ Johnson OLB: a pick I hated as soon as it happened and an example of why the premise of this thread is honestly dumb. This was a bad pick when it happened. Most people knew it.  Then came training camp and he did not look good. Then came the preseason which confirmed what we saw in TC. Then came the season which confirmed what we saw in preseason. To date, he has half a sack in his career. GRADE: F 4 (114) Chandlers Zavala G: Honestly the best pick of this draft which really speaks to how awful this draft is. Other than Bryce, the only pick still on the team. He is mostly average or below average depth which in round 4 is not terrible. But he had a pff score of 43.5 and though I think people have unrealistic expectations for draft picks, I still would want a little more from a fourth round pick GRADE: C+   5 (145) - Jammie Robinson S: I liked the pick when it happened but ended up being a disappointment. He logged 1 tackle with the falcons last year and not enough snaps to get a grade on PFF.  GRADE: F OVERALL DRAFT GRADE: F  
    • Kuhndog94
      26 first goal playoff thread

      By Kuhndog94 · Posted

      You gonna make me post Stank before every game?  I kid, I kid. 
    • DavidEng
      NHL 2026 Playoff Thread

      By DavidEng · Posted

      Final Avs 9 Wild 6. Defense never entered the building lol.
×
×
  • Create New...