Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade with Dolphins to get Watson?


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Contrary to everyone in here talking crap just to talk crap, there actually is some feasibility to this.  Perhaps CMC or a player like him addresses the need of a team like the Dolphins moreso than a team like the Texans.  3 team trades are completely feasible, and this is essentially a 3 team trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please, stop. The trade for Watson crap just keeps getting more and more ludicrous. Let it go and move on.

If we went through everything everyone has suggested AND somehow managed to talk both Houston and Watson into moving here, not only would we have a major hit to the old salary cap, but new contract in a couple of years and a QB who has the entire organization by the short and curlies. Getting him could potentially nullify both the new GM and the head coach, not to mention any other players of note that somehow remained untraded.

This is actually beginning to get pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Please, stop. The trade for Watson crap just keeps getting more and more ludicrous. Let it go and move on.

If we went through everything everyone has suggested AND somehow managed to talk both Houston and Watson into moving here, not only would we have a major hit to the old salary cap, but new contract in a couple of years and a QB who has the entire organization by the short and curlies. Getting him could potentially nullify both the new GM and the head coach, not to mention any other players of note that somehow remained untraded.

This is actually beginning to get pathetic.

Not really we are until I hear different we are number 1 at trying to get him, Tepper wants it done. Man Panther fans can never be happy we nothing. SMH

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

No, there isn't.

Yes, there is.  I'm not suggesting we will do it, or even that it's likely that we do it.  I'm saying that the concept of a 3 team trade is not as ludicrous as everyone seems to think.  This has nothing to do with Watson or the Dolphins, just the idea of a 3 team trade and how people are acting like they are impossible.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DeAngelo Beason said:

Yes, there is.  I'm not suggesting we will do it, or even that it's likely that we do it.  I'm saying that the concept of a 3 team trade is not as ludicrous as everyone seems to think.  This has nothing to do with Watson or the Dolphins, just the idea of a 3 team trade and how people are acting like they are impossible.

Any team that trades for Watson is giving up a significant haul to do so.

A team that makes a trade like that is not going to turn around and trade away the player they gave up all that stuff for.

And even if you found a team that was willing, the package it would take on our part would be mind numbing.

No, there isn't.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

If another team trades for Watson, it's done. We are not trading with that team.

Thats not what he's saying at all. 

Hes saying we should look to make a separate deal with Miami for the 3rd pick. 

THEN package the 3rd pick into our Watson offer. I agree if Miami aquires Watson we arent then trading with Miami to get him. That wasn't his scenario though. 

And there is some precedence for this. The Eagles traded up to pick 8 before then using pick 8 in a package to move up to 2 for Wentz. 

All that said, count me in the camp of people who much rather take Wilson/Fields at 3 than to package more assets into a Watson trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Any team that trades for Watson is giving up a significant haul to do so.

A team that makes a trade like that is not going to turn around and trade away the player they gave up all that stuff for.

And even if you found a team that was willing, the package it would take on our part would be mind numbing.

No, there isn't.

I don't think you're reading what I'm typing.  When I say "it's feasible" I am referring to the concept of 3 team trades.  I'm not talking about this specific scenario.

Everyone is acting like 3 team trades don't happen or are impossible.  That is absolutely untrue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Thats not what he's saying at all. 

Hes saying we should look to make a separate deal with Miami for the 3rd pick. 

THEN package the 3rd pick into our Watson offer. I agree if Miami aquires Watson we arent then trading with Miami to get him. That wasn't his scenario though. 

And there is some precedence for this. The Eagles traded up to pick 8 before then using pick 8 in a package to move up to 2 for Wentz. 

All that said, count me in the camp of people who much rather take Wilson/Fields at 3 than to package more assets into a Watson trade. 

Same issue.

It would take significant resources to trade up to the third pick, then after that trading the third pick plus additional resources to get Watson. The idea's crazy no matter which direction it goes.

If you trade up to the second or third pick, just draft someone with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Any team that trades for Watson is giving up a significant haul to do so.

A team that makes a trade like that is not going to turn around and trade away the player they gave up all that stuff for.

And even if you found a team that was willing, the package it would take on our part would be mind numbing.

No, there isn't.

For the record, you aren't reading what OP is saying either.  OP is saying trade with Miami to get the #3 pick, then use that pick and future picks to go get Watson.  Not trade with Miami to get Watson after Miami already traded for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

For the record, you aren't reading what OP is saying either.  OP is saying trade with Miami to get the #3 pick, then use that pick and future picks to go get Watson.  Not trade with Miami to get Watson after Miami already traded for him.

Already addressed.

With that said, we have people on here who are so devoted to this idea that if Watson does get traded somewhere else, I don't doubt they'll be proposing trade packages to get him from his new team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
×
×
  • Create New...