Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets willing to discuss trading Darnold

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
Just now, kungfoodude said:

I actually agree with this. I'd probably rather have Minshew than Darnold.

Now that is interesting...

Considering compensation who do you think has the better natural talent?

I would go with Darnold..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
Just now, WOW!! said:

Now that is interesting...

Considering compensation who do you think has the better natural talent?

I would go with Darnold..

Darnold is the more talented guy, both played for dumpster fire franchises but Minshew's results have been far better.

Better statistically almost across the board and if we want a QB that limits TO's but also puts the ball in the end zone, Minshew fits the bill more than Darnold. He actually has 31 career TD passes to just 11 Int's and is really a gungslinging type QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Darnold is the more talented guy, both played for dumpster fire franchises but Minshew's results have been far better.

Better statistically almost across the board and if we want a QB that limits TO's but also puts the ball in the end zone, Minshew fits the bill more than Darnold. He actually has 31 career TD passes to just 11 Int's and is really a gungslinging type QB.

But you would agree Minshew also played with better surrounding talent in a weaker division  right??

Context and situational differences does matter in this breakdown right??

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

He is one of the few QBs to grade out worse than Teddy did last year. I know he had Gase and people want to compare him to Tannehill, but he was never that awful even when playing for Gase.

I would take a hard pass. I think this is the kind of crap Tepper is hinting at not wanting, another scrub we want to make an all-pro overnight.

Teddy is a vet who played with probably the 2nd best trio at WR in the NFL and had a great OC

Sam is younger than Burrow, had no weapons and played for the Jets. 

Teddy was suppose to grade out better. 

Teams will want Sam.  That is the problem.  Which means he will garner more than he is worth.  So I don't want him because he will cost more than I would give up.  But if I could get him at a decent price I would take him. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bear Hands
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Navy_football
      Off season talk.

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • Navy_football
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By Navy_football · Posted

      It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...