Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

June Jones jumps on the Mac Jones train


panthers55
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, MHS831 said:

77.4% completions.  42 TDs vs. 4 Interceptions.  349 yards per game passing yards. 11.2 yards per attempt.  What more are you looking for?  Oh-and a national title. 

None of the QBs across the bottom of your list came very close to these numbers.

Exactly. He did everything asked of him and he only started 1 year in college due to the talent of Alabama. Imagine what he could have done in four years.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/11/2021 at 10:05 AM, ncfan said:

Again, stats and wins don’t mean crap in scouting a QB.  Film does.

As others have pointed, the offense is catered to him as well.  This combined with his weapons, and you get these #s

those #s are nice, but his film still leaves questions and leave concerns.

So what do you go by if you throw out stats and wins when scouting?

It seems to me like you're omitting a big part of the equation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

So what do you go by if you throw out stats and wins when scouting?

It seems to me like you're omitting a big part of the equation. 

honestly don’t know if your joking here. 
 

But Film and game tape.  
That’s literally all scouts care about.  They give 0 chits about stats or wins.  If it were the opposite, Josh Allen would’ve been drafted the 4th rd or later.  Watson would’ve been the top pick and not fallen to QB 3.  

 

 

Edited by ncfan
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

That’s great college production. Here’s Grier’s best season and he had nowhere near the talent on offense and WVU was the 4th best team in the Big 12 (3 more teams had 1 less win too):

67%, 351 yards per game, 37TDs and 8 INTs, 10.7 YPA

Grier wasn’t really that far behind and he certainly didn’t have a top 5/10 pick as his number 1 or multiple potential day 1/day 2 OL. Grier had an UDFA as his top guy and Jennings, who was drafted but hasn’t recorded a single NFL catch.

It seems like it is primarily the college football fans that can't really get past the stats and accomplishments in college. They just aren't as familiar with what it takes to be a successful NFL player, nor that it is a substantial step up in competition. Reference all the, "*insert name of undefeated #1 ranked college football team* could beat *insert the name of last place NFL franchise*" comments you see from that crowd. 

The stats aren't meaningless but the NFL is a relatively even playing field. There aren't many more uneven playing fields than P5 college football. Hence why it is important to study film rather than draft every college football All-American or NCAA stat leader. 

There is really no reason to even explain this to them anymore, you may as well just keep scrolling past these comments.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/11/2021 at 5:05 AM, ncfan said:

Again, stats and wins don’t mean crap in scouting a QB.  Film does.

As others have pointed, the offense is catered to him as well.  This combined with his weapons, and you get these #s

those #s are nice, but his film still leaves questions and leave concerns.

And folks who evaluate QBs like Simms and has done the job himself and has been right on for several.of the drafts says the film is good and he can make all the throws. As a 1 year starter his skills are much further along than you would expect.  So you are wrong, his film is actually very good. What too many are looking at is one picture where he looks fat. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

It seems like it is primarily the college football fans that can't really get past the stats and accomplishments in college. They just aren't as familiar with what it takes to be a successful NFL player, nor that it is a substantial step up in competition. Reference all the, "*insert name of undefeated #1 ranked college football team* could beat *insert the name of last place NFL franchise*" comments you see from that crowd. 

The stats aren't meaningless but the NFL is a relatively even playing field. There aren't many more uneven playing fields than P5 college football. Hence why it is important to study film rather than draft every college football All-American or NCAA stat leader. 

There is really no reason to even explain this to them anymore, you may as well just keep scrolling past these comments.

Which is why a guy like Simms who.played QB in the NFL and has been right on with his evaluations over several years should be heeded. He said Jones is underated and given he was a 1 year starter is well ahead of where you expect. Not only does he move well in the pocket but he looks off safeties, goes through his progressions and did things in college that many rookie in the NFL still havent mastered.  Stats are just numbers but film is important and his is good from what I have read from folks who should know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ncfan said:

 

The problem with sound bytes like this is context. Are we talking 1 or 50? The film shows 1. Plus those first 8 games were his first 8 starts in college. What about comparing his first 4 games with his last 4 and evaluate his improvement.

No this says little to nothing. I will go with Simms on this one who has a track record of correctly predicting who will be best in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Which is why a guy like Simms who.played QB in the NFL and has been right on with his evaluations over several years should be heeded. He said Jones is underated and given he was a 1 year starter is well ahead of where you expect. Not only does he move well in the pocket but he looks off safeties, goes through his progressions and did things in college that many rookie in the NFL still havent mastered.  Stats are just numbers but film is important and his is good from what I have read from folks who should know.

Just because Simms says somethings and gets a few right doesn’t mean he is the go to.  
Kiper hits some in a while but you saw what he said about Clausen now everyone is going back and laughing.

 

hell, Simms has Dyami Brown the UNC WR as a top 20 overall prospect in this draft.  Even my UNC homerism cant put him there.

 

 

Simms has a rd 2 grade on Lance.  While more of the clued in guys unlike the Kipers, Simms, etc chasing the hot takes etc.  All have Lance as a top 10 guy.  
heck @Vergehas said with her connections in the league scouts that Lance is looked at as a Top 10 guy.  

Edited by ncfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldhamA said:

So what do you go by if you throw out stats and wins when scouting?

It seems to me like you're omitting a big part of the equation. 

You go by your fng eyeballs. 

A great pass can be dropped but that doesn't show on stats. 

A bad pass can be caught.

A pick can be dropped. 

Football isn't a math problem. 

This isn't poker but a bunch of STEM nerds are trying to make it out to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You honestly think Tampa would have traded down with a division rival so their rival could land a “generational player” at a massive position of need for TB?   bruh
    • Ya'll better quit throwing shots at Zod. He'll come in here and ban everybody. I had a friend @prosource who was banned in 2015 because he said some very minor things about Zod being an ass to the posters on the main forum after starting the All-Pro one. He said he felt like another level is cool, but don't punch down on people that don't want All-Pro. (He did say that it wasn't going to last long anyways.🤔) I distinctly remember him calling and being like "dude, I got banned, my profile says I don't have access to the Huddle!") I feel like once Tepper came in and cut off all unofficial access to the team, Zod was going to be around less. The All-Pro board had really good photos, even in game stuff, and I remember seeing him behind a little fenced in area at Wofford for non team sanctioned press/photographers after Tepper bought the team. I knew then his ego wouldn't allow him to continue with past fervency and effort with that reduction in access. Dude was literally in the locker room when JR was owner.  I came over in 2011 immediately after finding out this place existed. I was super involved with the Charlotte forum, and fell off after its demise. I will never forget arguing Pep over Ryan Sims on that forum! Who is Ryan Sims some of you may ask? My answer is exactly!
    • And not see him running free. Because has been free a lot more than he gets credit for.    Now what XL does with that when he does see the ball, is on him. 
×
×
  • Create New...