Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Free Agent Money is about 1/3 of what it has been


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

The market is worse than you think. Last week, I used a chart in this column comparing the average cap space available this year entering free agency per team ($13.06 million) to last year’s cap space per team ($43.33 million). But I should have used an asterisk. That doesn’t include the rookie pool that teams have to budget for, which averages between $7 million and $10 million per team. So you see Kansas City firing both starting tackles and think, “They’re $12 million under the cap—they can buy one this week in a depressed market.” Budgeting for the rookie pool, though, would leave KC somewhere near $5 million under the cap in reality. But overall, teams last year entered the league year with about $1.3 billion to spend on free agents and rookies; this year the number is about $420 million. So it’s no exaggeration to think you’ll see one-third of the early action as you did last year.

Wow.

Here is a tip for the Panthers, maybe: There’s never been so many tempting rushers in a free-agency class. Aldon Smith could have multiple double-digit-sack seasons left after rising in Dallas last year; Bud Dupree was on his way to a career year last year in Pittsburgh before getting hurt; Carl Lawson is terminally underrated; Melvin Ingram should be due for a rebound; and Haason Reddick, Matthew Judon and Trey Hendrickson all are intriguing. A month from now, two or three of those players will be unsigned and have massive chips on their shoulder, almost certain to be smart one-year buys while they re-establish a market for 2022.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/03/15/drew-brees-retires-nfl-free-agency-fmia-peter-king/

Gonna be fun watching this thing play out, but if we don't start signing a few players until next week to get some bargains, I will get the strategy. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Lawson got traded he is not available 

Zeitler (G, Giants) signed with the Ravens for about $7m+ per year.  He was cut last week, fwiw, so he has signed.

 

Last year, Miller played for $4m.  I bet he sits and we could get him for half that this season.  Same for some other free agents.  I would spend on a CB and lock him into a long term deal.  I want Cameron Sutton, but that is just me.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Lol, I had already pied his post. It does suck since it was all so obvious. That’s what happens when you clearly have the wrong guy in place. The writing on the wall of Brees and Brady being 1-2 years from retiring and Ryan on the downward slope to 40, a great QB class, solid young pieces needing extensions in the next few years (before Chinn and Brown), likely getting a 3rd round comp and 3 more comp picks (could have drafted BPA OL with all 4), a strong OL draft class and the ability to build up cap for a 2022+ run at top FAs. It really couldn’t have been more obvious a play. Nope, we went for broke to try and finish 3rd in our division ahead of Atlanta who now has a great slot for their next QB if they want. Hopefully, we get lucky and get the right QB which will solve a lot of issues, but we could have put a lot more pieces in place around them.

Just wanted to give you the opportunity to get another "I fuging told you so" in. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

As a fan, even if us tankers last year were considered not real fans, I want to win it all. I enjoyed watching the young guys play well but I actually would have been happier to lose every game. Finishing 2-9 doesn’t set us for success. Definitely still frustrated that we had it all lined up and Marty got one last chance to prove his worth.

Last year was the most stress free year of Panthers football I have ever watched. I literally just approached it as entertainment and didn't get upset very often. Seeing the wins was nice because it showed we had some real moxy and potential, and the losses didn't bother me much(except for the Redskins one, that one had me pissed) because I knew that the better our draft pick was, the better the shots we had at higher talent level.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...