Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bills sign Mitch T.....


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Too much.

That in conjunction that we gave him security a year too long. I didn't mind the money as much as what amounted to a two-year (as opposed to the standard one-year) prove-it deal. It's like, "Who came up with that sh¡t?" Somebody (or bodies) creatively reinvented the damn wheel for no good reason...Only because Teddy wanted them to? fug that! He just would o' been a Bear!

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Who envisioned Trubisky getting a big deal?

I was definitely one of them and I’m here for the whoopin. I was certain he would sign for more than 5mil per and thought it would be more in the 8+ mil range. I was wrong. 
 

I put the Bills in the top 3 of strangest landing spots for Trubisky. Not sure the play here. He either doesn’t want the pressure of starting again or is angling for a bigger deal with more cap available next year. Like the Saints, I’m kicking the can down the road on my prediction of what deal he signs. Ha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He goes to a good team, with not a lot of pressure.  He gets to watch and learn from another young qb, and Buffalo has decent offensive talent, so if he does play due to injury, he doesn't have to carry the team.  And he gets paid well to do it.  And he might even have a shot at a ring.  Very good scenario for him.

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...