Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?

Sasquatch

By Sasquatch,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

it isn’t underestimation.

 Just acknowledging what he is and has been of late.   

which is sketchy, attention seeking with political aspirations.  

And it is all running through him via quickly stacked allegations that all read nearly identical. 

and then you factor in Watson’s credibility and earned rep...

which means you got to wait until the facts actually start coming into play before you convict him in the court of public opinion. 

Sure it is. 

Your opinion, nothing more. 

Again, simply your opinion and completely unrelated to his acumen as an attorney. 

Seems logical...

Watson drove his credibility into the ditch over the last 4-6 months with his petulant behaviour.  

It is a fact that 14 formal complaints/lawsuits have been filed.  Within those complaints there are a lot of allegations...

...you are correct that until Watson presents his side of the story no conclusions should be drawn...

...yet you are choosing to besmirch the character of the plaintiffs simply because they chose to hire a (highly capable and successful) lawyer you don't like.  

Question -- do you believe it's possible the plaintiffs are telling the truth?

Yes or no?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Sure it is. 

Your opinion, nothing more. 

Again, simply your opinion and completely unrelated to his acumen as an attorney. 

Seems logical...

Watson drove his credibility into the ditch over the last 4-6 months with his petulant behaviour.  

It is a fact that 14 formal complaints/lawsuits have been filed.  Within those complaints there are a lot of allegations...

...you are correct that until Watson presents his side of the story no conclusions should be drawn...

...yet you are choosing to besmirch the character of the plaintiffs simply because they chose to hire a (highly capable and successful) lawyer you don't like.  

Question -- do you believe it's possible the plaintiffs are telling the truth?

Yes or no?

it isn't my opinion that the attorney has political aspirations or that he has committed sketchy acts like creating fake text messages in an attempt to dupe people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CRA said:

it isn't my opinion that the attorney has political aspirations or that he has committed sketchy acts like creating fake text messages to in an attempt to dupe people. 

Complete horse hockey...

Again, do you believe it is possible the plaintiffs are telling the truth?

Yes or no?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Complete horse hockey...

Again, do you believe it is possible the plaintiffs are telling the truth?

Yes or no?

He literally just ran for public office last election cycle. 

He admitted to using created fake texts as the mayor of Houston was calling on him to be criminally prosecuted.  

I’ve continuously maintained either side could be telling the truth and people need to pump the breaks on judgement 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Please say Watson is guilty because I want to know how you know!

Never said he was guilty but I did say when the accusers hit double digits that is incredibly incriminating especially they all say pretty much the same thing.  They all arent some random instagram models a lot of them are licensed and professional.  So yeah, it aint looking good for him.

But if you have an example of a conspiracy of a lawyer or whoever paying 20 or so women to blatantly lie about someone then by all means post it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

He literally just ran for public office last election cycle. 

He admitted to using created fake texts as the mayor of Houston was calling on him to be criminally prosecuted.  

I’ve continuously maintained either side could be telling the truth and people need to pump the breaks on judgement 

 

 

Give me a scenario where at least 14 women are lying about this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Give me a scenario where at least 14 women are lying about this. 

everything is it's own thing.   How many people have to accuse someone of something before they should just be deemed guilty. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stumpy
      Flux

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Aussie Tank
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • Jackie Lee
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...