Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

P.J. Walker


CPsinceDay1
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

PJ Walker is better than Grier.  That’s basically the PJ conversation at this point.  

We're in trouble if either is starting (and given Sam's injury history, that's definitely within the range of outcomes). The betting line moves at least 5-7 points if Sam isn't the starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, trueblade said:

We're in trouble if either is starting (and given Sam's injury history, that's definitely within the range of outcomes). The betting line moves at least 5-7 points if Sam isn't the starter.

Yeah, it looks like he has yet to play a complete season.  Hopefully with better protection, we'll keep him on the field.  Hopefully.

Of course an oline can't do anything about mono.

eab785ed277143cdaf770e99418d5a29_md.jpg

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, trueblade said:

We're in trouble if either is starting (and given Sam's injury history, that's definitely within the range of outcomes). The betting line moves at least 5-7 points if Sam isn't the starter.

I don’t know.  What was the line of the Lions game last year vs a normal Teddy game? 

I mean I don’t want to see PJ.  But I don’t buy a 7 point swing if Darnold can’t go.  
 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/27/2021 at 7:15 AM, CPsinceDay1 said:

Yet, he beat out Will for the #2 last year...so why is Will still on the team?

Then Tommy's just a TE to you too huh?

The fact that Grier was inactive for nine of the final eleven games of the 2020 season seems to be a good indicator that he has some work to do in order to leapfrog P.J. Walker for the No. 2 spot. With OTAs beginning, Grier will need to make the most out of every single rep he gets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don’t know.  What was the line of the Lions game last year vs a normal Teddy game? 

I mean I don’t want to see PJ.  But I don’t buy a 7 point swing if Darnold can’t go.  
 

I know right?  If PJ hadn't thrown those 2 ints in the endzone we'd be talking how we have the best backup QB in the league because he definitely moved the ball.  Rookie mistake, but D came thru for the W.

I'm convinced Marshal and Anderson are going to fix the rz problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don’t know.  What was the line of the Lions game last year vs a normal Teddy game?
 

That's going to depend much more on the opponent. What you need to see if the line moves after an injury report, and Teddy's knee was already in question so that was baked into the initial line.

Edited by trueblade
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, trueblade said:

That's going to depend much more on the opponent. What you need to see if line movement after an injury report, and Teddy's knee was already in question so that was baked into the initial line.

well, I just checked it. It was a 5 point swing.  I stand corrected. 

we went from -2.5 to +2.5  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 5/28/2021 at 10:40 AM, SBBlue said:

I know right?  If PJ hadn't thrown those 2 ints in the endzone we'd be talking how we have the best backup QB in the league because he definitely moved the ball.  Rookie mistake, but D came thru for the W.

I'm convinced Marshal and Anderson are going to fix the rz problems.

Marshall yes...but Tremble hands are surprisedly well...add Arnold, RZ should not be a problem this year. But that once again falls on the play calling... PJ made lemonade on that play above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hear you and I have said the same thing at times, but blanket statements are accurate part of the time at best.  I have also coached kids who had the "tools" but they were slow and unproductive on the field--and a few adjustments to the scheme or teaching techniques, and the light comes on.  We call them "late bloomers."  Based on my limited experience, it should be called "coaching."  As a former coach, if you gave me kids with the tools and I could not get them to perform at the level of their ability, then I have failed.  The coaches know this, so their timetables to win may be shorter than the time they have to develop a player--I think a lot of talent goes down the disposal, which is why the success rate for drafted players is so low. In my view, based on my career as a professor and researcher, my job is to produce successful people for the workplace.   I use data to identify central problems and I use my relationships with my students to strengthen weaknesses.  I have a limited amount of time to do this before a decision is made about their development.  In this case, I would look at the variables (data and the situational influences unique to this individual that may have stunted growth) and not the ineffective player as the center of the problem.  The team has already interviewed him, talked to his college coaches, measured him, etc. So I would minimize the assumption that the kid is the problem and look at his system of support and teaching strategies.  Nobody wants to admit THEY might be the problem.  To blame a first-rounder for failing, you have to admit either you did not properly identify the prospect's potential (which is your job) or you were unable to prepare that prospect (with all the tools that got him the job) to succeed (also your job).  So are we going to blame the 24-year-old kid with all the tools to succeed for sucking or are we going to take responsibility for his success as his mentors and teachers?  
    • i was hoping they might bring robinson back but he went to the darkside.  They will need to sign a free agent as Evero does not like to start rookies.
    • Flexibility. If they don’t work out we simply walk away. If they look great we have the first crack at extending them. 
×
×
  • Create New...