Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How realistic a chance at Sewell?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just saw this from Joe Person...

There's also been word that Joe Burrow is lobbying the team to take a receiver like Ja'Marr Chase.

(someone snapped you like a twig last year dude, but you be you) 😕

Most mocks previously had Penei Sewell going to the Bengals, but some draftniks are changing their mind now. I've even seen one that had him going to the Broncos at pick nine.

So my question would be this: How realistic a chance do you think the Panthers have of getting Sewell at pick eight?

For that matter, if he fell to pick six or seven, would you consider trading up?

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Top 4 QBs > Sewell > Defensive Player (Parsons, Surtain) > Slater >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Mac Jones

A pretty good number (and probably the majority) of the mocks coming out now have the top four quarterbacks gone by pick five or six at the latest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

A pretty good number (and probably the majority) of the mocks coming out now have the top four quarterbacks gone by pick five or six at the latest.

I would love Sewell. He's gonna be great I think. People whine about Joe Thomas and the Browns but forget they drafted a QB in the 1st round that year (Brady Quinn) and everyone would take Joe over Brady Quinn.

Mac Jones is this years Brady Quinn.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

1- Lawrence

2- Wilson

3- Lance

4- Pitts

5- Chase

6- D. Smith?

7- Jaylen Waddle?/Sewell/Slater?/Parson?

8- Fields

 

(not sure what happened to your font)

You don't think anybody (like Denver perhaps) trades ahead of us for a quarterback?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

(not sure what happened to your font)

You don't think anybody (like Denver perhaps) trades ahead of us for a quarterback?

oh Denver definitely could, this is assuming no more trades. 

I'm not convinced Den is sold on any of these QBs being better than Lock. Ben Allbright is super well connected in the league and esp with the Broncos and he keeps advocating for Lock (which makes me think thats the organization saying it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

oh Denver definitely could, this is assuming no more trades. 

I'm not convinced Den is sold on any of these QBs being better than Lock. Ben Allbright is super well connected in the league and esp with the Broncos and he keeps advocating for Lock (which makes me think thats the organization saying it)

Just using Denver as an example.

Heck, people have even suggested the Patriots might trade up. That sounds crazy, but it's a crazy offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Coker has certainly earned it. Good for him.
    • I don't think we don't call things aggressively, for a Canales offense, anyway. We don't have a QB who makes aggressive throws nor stresses defenses downfield. He is at a career low on 20+ attempts per game and his career 10-20 QB rating is abysmal.  That will always be a limiting factor IF you are looking for a high flying, downfield offense. I am not even that concerned about it, I just want to see effective offense and we decidedly do not possess that. A large chunk of that is Bryce. I think the second biggest chunk is Canales. All the other components(XL included) are fairly minor in comparison to those two things. I am an advocate of attempting to improve at QB. I am not focused on finding "The QB." We failed at that with Bryce. So let's just get better. If that's a one year vet or a draftee or a cheap trade or some combination of any/all, we should do that. We have to get that QB better. Bryce will fail in 2026 and we need to have REALISTIC options to take over when that happens. That ain't Andy Dalton or Hendon Hooker or Jack Plummer or Mike White or....you get the picture. Be serious about hedging that Bryce bet and not just having to make do if he struggles or gets injured.  My mind is definitely made up on Canales. It's year two and he hasn't improved much, nor do I think the bones of a good HC are there. Ron Rivera got to that point after two seasons and he was open about the changes he had to make and advice he got to make that leap in year 3. If we don't see the same after next year, how is he not just Brian Daboll?
    • Not really buying it because T-mac faces stiffer competition week in and week out. 
×
×
  • Create New...