Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Houston police opening investigation on Deshaun Watson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It was Florio who pointed out that it backfired.

Hardin has been saying from the beginning that Watson had no idea who was accusing him. It was already pretty obvious that was bullsh-t. This makes it more so.

Admitting that Watson had a sexual encounter with one of his masseuses probably didn't help either, even with the proviso that it was consensual.

I don't think Hardin used the terms "didn't have any idea." I think what he's said is that Buzbee is using anonymity of the alleged victims--which is ostensibly meant to shield victims--in order to win in the court of public opinion before Watson can even properly defend himsrlf. He's even said that releasing the names confidentially would be acceptable so that he can develop a proper defense as opposed to being pigtied by a circus-like atmosphere. 

Of course if it can be proved that this woman (and other women) in this lawsuit were involved in consensual sex acts sex acts with other clients, that could have repercussions in the Watson case. So admitting that he had consensual sex could in fact help his case out a lot. 

The fact that the police have opened an investigation was really a natural progression of things, but it's not really some earth shattering event for Watson at this moment, and it doesn't speak speak to his innocence or guilt of actual criminal sexual assault. That's just the way it is!

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ladypanther said:

The number of women involved ...I think it is up to 39.....either accusing or supporting him.... is crazy and a cause for concern.  Why would Deshaun go so so many different people for a massage and why all women?

Have you read any of the details? Its fullllllll boat of WTF. I dont even know were to start, just about everything is cover form body liquids(one woman poo herself in disgust), air humping, tiny towel, non-stop "Will you get my groin" while the towel turned into a tent. No idea why he thought what he was doing was "perfectly normal". 

Please for the love of GOD, no one tell Watson about prostate doctors..... He'll be on twatter going in the DMs in record time.  I bet he'll bring his own glove too.... Oh that was in one the accounts as well, something something fist me. I quit after that one..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I don't think Hardin used the terms "didn't have any idea." I think what he's said is that Buzbee is using anonymity of the alleged victims--which is ostensibly meant to shield victims--in order to win in the court of public opinion before Watson can even properly defend himsrlf. He's even said that releasing the names confidentially would be acceptable so that he can develop a proper defense as opposed to being pigtied by a circus-like atmosphere. 

Of course if it can be proved that this woman (and other women) in this lawsuit were involved in consensual sex acts sex acts with other clients, that could have repercussions in the Watson case. So admitting that he had consensual sex could in fact help his case out a lot. 

The fact that the police have opened an investigation was really a natural progression of things, but it's not really some earth shattering event for Watson at this moment, and it doesn't speak speak to his innocence or guilt of actual criminal sexual assault. That's just the way it is!

The notion that Watson doesn't know who's accusing him, yet could amazingly produce a long list of people who aren't, is a pretty huge stretch.

And the spin on the consensual thing? Come on, dude.

Also, again no this isn't a natural progression. The investigation is happening because somebody filed a complaint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you are acting like you have no concept of "innocent until proven guilty." You're also rushing to judgment before all the facts come out! Watson could be guilty of sexual assault, or he could just be guilty of being a pervert, or he could be the victim of opportunists jumping on the bandwagon in order for a nice payday. Until the case is adjudicated, including examination and cross-examination of witnesses, and the introduction of any physical evidence (if there is any), Watson will be deemed as innocent. If you don't like it, then you must not like American jurisprudence.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The notion that Watson doesn't know who's accusing him, yet could amazingly produce a long list of people who aren't, is a pretty huge stretch.

And the spin on the consensual thing? Come on, dude.

Also, again no this isn't a natural progression. The investigation is happening because somebody filed a complaint.

You can argue the semantics of it all you like. Even some Huddlers figured that an investigation by the HPD would eventually happen. If what at least one woman says is true, then it was an inevitability! 

Buzbee was the one seemingly trying to hedge his bets on the police thing--for whatever reasons--and, no, his weak, unprofessional excuse about possible tampering was nonsense. Hardin has essentially said for days that they'd welcome any investigation because it actually unties his hands in some respect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Some of you are acting like you have no concept of "innocent until proven guilty." You're also rushing to judgment before all the facts come out! Watson could be guilty of sexual assault, or he could just be guilty of being a pervert, or he could be the victim of opportunists jumping on the bandwagon in order for a nice payday. Until the case is adjudicated, including examination and cross-examination of witnesses, and the introduction of any physical evidence (if there is any), Watson will be deemed as innocent. If you don't like it, then you must not like American jurisprudence.

Would you allow any of your family members to give Watson a massage one-on-one? Simple yes or no. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Some of you are acting like you have no concept of "innocent until proven guilty." You're also rushing to judgment before all the facts come out! Watson could be guilty of sexual assault, or he could just be guilty of being a pervert, or he could be the victim of opportunists jumping on the bandwagon in order for a nice payday. Until the case is adjudicated, including examination and cross-examination of witnesses, and the introduction of any physical evidence (if there is any), Watson will be deemed as innocent. If you don't like it, then you must not like American jurisprudence.

It’s such a bizarre story that I’m waiting to see some cold hard facts and evidence before I crucify the guy. Watson is either one of the biggest sexual deviants in sports history, or this is a smear job of epic proportions. There is no in between. 

Buzbee is a well-known wildcard. The fact they are all accusers are anonymous raises an eyebrow for me. Andrew Cuomo’s accusers are all out in the open, why aren’t Watson’s? My gut feeling is some of these “masseuses” are really Instagram models that dabble in escort services under the guise of giving a massage. It’s a well known slight of hand in the industry, and a huge gray area tightrope that Buzbee has to carefully navigate. Making all accusers anonymous let’s him control the narrative. 

But hey, I’m not ruling out the fact Watson could have sexually assaulted these women, regardless of if the women were escorts or not. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

Would you allow any of your family members to give Watson a massage one-on-one? Simple yes or no. 

Questions and answers dealing with possibly complex matters can't be made simplistic with a simple "yes or no."

But, would I now? Hell no! 

Before all this came out, if they were actually a licensed professional, why would I try to stop them? Get real! 

But like I alluded to, you can be what many would consider a pervert without being a criminal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MHS831 said:

The police are investigating this due to public pressure.  The fact that Watson goes to different women is disturbing; it suggests that the masseuse and not the massage were the focal point--but not a crime.  We know this--a celebrity has to be very careful, and that is what DW is in Texas.  This was not smart, regardless, because he made himself vulnerable.  

I have not been keeping up, but is there video evidence of this?  It would seem, to protect yourself and your client, that sessions would be recorded.

Which of these are you seeking sexual favors from? That's why he didn't ask some of them.

spacer.png

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, hepcat said:

It’s such a bizarre story that I’m waiting to see some cold hard facts and evidence before I crucify the guy. Watson is either one of the biggest sexual deviants in sports history, or this is a smear job of epic proportions. There is no in between. 

Buzbee is a well-known wildcard. The fact they are all accusers are anonymous raises an eyebrow for me. Andrew Cuomo’s accusers are all out in the open, why aren’t Watson’s? My gut feeling is some of these “masseuses” are really Instagram models that dabble in escort services under the guise of giving a massage. It’s a well known slight of hand in the industry, and a huge gray area tightrope that Buzbee has to carefully navigate. Making all accusers anonymous let’s him control the narrative. 

But hey, I’m not ruling out the fact Watson could have sexually assaulted these women, regardless of if the women were escorts or not. 

Can't fault you at all for that! If it's proven that he forced sex acts, then he's got serious problems, but if these acts actually were consensual, they all have issues! Not the kinda people I want associated with me and mine.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cookinbrak said:

Also, do any of you go to 39 different doctors for the same thing? Or auto repair shops? Or dog groomers? No, you find a good one and use them.

No, but I might hire 39 prostitutes if I was into that kind of thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Questions and answers dealing with possibly complex matters can't be made simplistic with a simple "yes or no."

But, would I now? Hell no! 

Before all this came out, if they were actually a licensed professional, why would I try to stop them? Get real! 

But like I alluded to, you can be what many would consider a pervert without being a criminal. 

I dont think hes innocent or guilty. Also no chance any of my family nor I, would be meeting him one-on-one at some motels with his tiny towel. People talk, in the same groups people talk. If your licensed daughter heard the rumors about Watson and you didnt care....  Still years later she could join the lawsuit or add to the rumors. I mean thats a great story to tell the friends and family, right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn the Tankers are already out here talking bout tanking?  
    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
×
×
  • Create New...