Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers trade for Sam Darnold

Memphis

By Memphis,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

My 2 cents.

The chances of us adding one of the top 5 rookie QBs was very slim.  Too many  teams in front of us were willing to trade down which meant we would have to give up high value picks to move up including next year's first.  Especially Atlanta who would either want all our picks until 2025 or intentionally trade down to ensure we lost one of these QBs.  Meaning 4 QBs off the board before any other position is selected.  That leaves Jones, Fields or Lance left depending on what SF does and still 4 spots to go.    I don't know the what Rhule and Co. thought of the draft picks but personally I wasn't overly excited about any of the picks outside of Lawrence and Wilson.  Intrigued yes, overly excited no. Had we selected any of them I would have trusted the management. 

Darnold has not had the best of starts in his career but he's talented and we basically have 2 years to figure him out.  2019 wasn't great for him but it wasn't garbage as many have stated.  Nearly 62% completions.  19 TDs 13 ints.   In his 2nd year with minimal talent around him.  We have CMC, DJ and Anderson to help.   We've added a couple of TEs that could help or maybe we draft Pitts.  I think once he nails a couple of deep passes to Moore and Anderson the hate will go away.  Plus he has some connections with Anderson.  

Draft capital value is diminished if it isn't for this year.   Basically making them wait a full year to get their money back.   So a 3rd or 4th this year is a 2nd next.  We get the opportunity to utilize our full draft picks.  I believe we have a 6th round compensation pick this year. 

I think the key to this trade will be how well we nail this draft.  If we hit on our top 4 like we did last year.  Our O-line should be better.  That's providing they stick to their plan on drafting offensive players especially Linemen.  

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...