Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drafting a QB


Dog Runner
 Share

Recommended Posts

We're probably in this same spot next year if we don't, so if the draft board falls that there's a QB there we would've been interested in before trading for Darnold then we should still draft him. These reclamation projects rarely work out. If it does, then we can move the newly drafted QB.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lance is the only option I see being available.

Go for it, who's to say we build a wall and Sam still rolls out, it's in his nature what good is the o-line if your QB is still seeing ghosts of Xmas past.

Lance behind Sam for a year. FA comes around again pick up some vets on the o-line or through the draft but at least we have our QB for the future.

Do we really want to be the team always looking for a starting QB.

Regardless the staff, excuses for Sam has to stop. He was/is who he is. Turnover machine.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to put this out there.. I think you guys maybe more enamoured with these QBS not name Lawrance and Wilson then the team is.. I also think that after the 49ers trade they can see the writing on the wall 1st 5 picks will probably be 4 QBS gone.. And then your sweating 3 picks hoping nobody jumps up for the 5th QB in this draft you might not be gaga about.. 

I'd rather be in the position we're in now with the opportunity to get either one of the best OT's or CB's or great player at another position instead of the 5th best QB in the draft..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Even if it did.. Who is to say they liked the 4th or 5th best QB in this draft??

Its obvious that if they like Fields they would have traded up, its been reported that the panthers passed on the miami pick and if they wanted Lance then they wouldnt have traded for SD.  The entire front office was at his pro day and they basically said "no thanks".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its obvious that if they like Fields they would have traded up, its been reported that the panthers passed on the miami pick and if they wanted Lance then they wouldnt have traded for SD.  The entire front office was at his pro day and they basically said "no thanks".

I just think ppl here need to read the room better... You maybe way more Gaga over some of these QBS then they were plain an simple.. This FO may have liked 3 QBS and once the 49ers made that trade they can see that all were going to be gone in the 1st 3 picks..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...