Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Source: Panthers Open to Drafting Quarterback With No. 8 Pick


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Verge said:

I wouldn't rule out Jaylen Waddle either. 

 

Our OL is still garbage. Thats the mind blowing aspect of this. We watched Cam go from an incredible talent to a nonfunctional QB due to garbage OL. I dont want a QB, WR, TE,CB, etc until we spend our first few picks on OL. Rhule is not an idiot and was an NFL OL coach. He sees this dumpster fire and as much as folks here want shiny things, I want in your face road grading animals that open holes and run the Chase Youngs of the world into Winston-Salem. Dont be stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bobcat91 said:

 

Our OL is still garbage. Thats the mind blowing aspect of this. We watched Cam go from an incredible talent to a nonfunctional QB due to garbage OL. I dont want a QB, WR, TE,CB, etc until we spend our first few picks on OL. Rhule is not an idiot and was an NFL OL coach. He sees this dumpster fire and as much as folks here want shiny things, I want in your face road grading animals that open holes and run the Chase Youngs of the world into Winston-Salem. Dont be stupid. 

The depth at OT this year is bonkers. I would prefer OT at 8 myself, but the reasoning behind drafting a weapon or QB at 8 would be that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bobcat91 said:

 

Our OL is still garbage. Thats the mind blowing aspect of this. We watched Cam go from an incredible talent to a nonfunctional QB due to garbage OL. I dont want a QB, WR, TE,CB, etc until we spend our first few picks on OL. Rhule is not an idiot and was an NFL OL coach. He sees this dumpster fire and as much as folks here want shiny things, I want in your face road grading animals that open holes and run the Chase Youngs of the world into Winston-Salem. Dont be stupid. 

I agree, but maybe the think the drop off from Slater (Sewell probably won’t be there at 8...) and the round 2 LTs isn’t as big as from Chase/Waddle/Smith and the next tier of WRs. Not saying it’s right, but that could be a thought process...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

The depth at OT this year is bonkers. I would prefer OT at 8 myself, but the reasoning behind drafting a weapon or QB at 8 would be that. 

Will we be able to get another pick for Teddy or we will ultimately have to cut him? An extra fourth or fifth this year could be nice in an excellent Oline draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

After quarterbacks go in the top three picks, the draft will begin in earnest when the Falcons go on the clock at No. 4.

Should Atlanta take Pitts, as many around the league anticipate, and Cincinnati take Chase at No. 5, it’s not hard to envision the Dolphins getting some sweet offers to move out of the sixth spot. The Broncos (who pick ninth) need a quarterback. Perhaps they would be willing to part with a second-rounder to move up three spots to get one.

https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nfl/miami-dolphins/article250605514.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I agree, but maybe the think the drop off from Slater (Sewell probably won’t be there at 8...) and the round 2 LTs isn’t as big as from Chase/Waddle/Smith and the next tier of WRs. Not saying it’s right, but that could be a thought process...

Pretty sure the Panthers like Slater better anyway

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...