Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drafting a QB in Round 1: Why we won't do it


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I would be apprehensive for sure but their coach is one of the best in the game so I would trust him 100%.  I just didnt want him because I am still going through Bridgewater  ptsd

The thing that bothered me most about Teddy---he just did not seem to care--or understand the situation.  Just making $1.25 million per game to go through the motions.   He had the ability--nothing great, but he just did not play like a guy getting a chance to revive his career.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

#1, 2, and 3 priority is to beef up that OL.

Give darnold a chance to ball in a much better situation with an OL that doesn't suck. If he works out, great  if he doesn't, keep searching but know that whatever QB you get will be protected.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2021 at 6:11 AM, MHS831 said:

I get the need for LT---I really do.  I want a plug and play LT--but I am trying to figure out what we will do--by reading the coffee grounds (we don't have tea leaves here.)  I see, at the bottom of my morning joe--SLOT WR or PItts.  What do I want to see?  SEWELL.🤔

If Sewell or Slater are still options at 8 and we ultimately wind up with that super hard to get your hands on, most pressing of all needs a....

...slot receiver...

..then I am gonna be pissed.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

If Sewell or Slater are still options at 8 and we ultimately wind up with that super hard to get your hands on, most pressing of all needs a....

...slot receiver...

..then I am gonna be pissed.

Me too, bro.  Of course, just a hunch, but based on the talent that is likely to fall to us, I see Sewell as a no brainer, then I see Pitts, then I see Slater vs. Waddle?????  I can say that I am becoming increasingly against trading back in round 1. The talent level in areas of need seem to be dropping off around 10.

They signed 2 OTs this offseason and may have some glimmer of hope for Little (doubt it).  Erving and Scott, they may assume, can hold down the fort until a second round OT is ready.. They may like the depth in round 2, but we still need a CB....I would not be surprised to see them trade back up into round 2 (which is why Fitts wanted all three picks in the Darnold deal) so that we walk away on day 2 with a slot WR or Pitts, a CB, and a LT. 

That to me would be a good draft.  The picks 4-6x2, in my opinion, could be for trading up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB/Sewell or trade down.  Now, we could draft a QB and then start negotiating!  Oh yeah, we could really put Ron's and Hurney's feet to the fire.  You know Hurney like's to give the farm away.  Hold a shiney new QB out there in front of him and let the mugging commence.

We get #19, #51, and #83 (2nd of their 3rds).  Yes, there is a some meat left on that bone for them and not completely balanced, but I would not budge if I were the Panthers and make them eat the difference as a QB premium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you offered me the very best WR, TE, OT in the league...I could have my choice...I'm going with the OT.

 

I hope that we do the same at 8, IF he's graded out that high...I don't think that any of these QB's are going to be in the top 5 in the league over the next 2/3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get Darnold has talent and was in a terrible situation with the Jets. However, his turnover issues weren’t something that just started happening in New York.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/clutchpoints.com/nfl-draft-sam-darnold-knows-his-turnover-issues-in-college-are-a-concern/amp/
 

27 starts with 22 interceptions and 21 fumbles. 43 turnovers in 27 starts is Winston bad... This wasn’t against SEC defenses either, he was in the defenseless PAC 12.  I love the optimism and understand he is still very young. However going all in on a QB who has shown on both levels TOs are a big issue is extremely risky. If Lance is there, I understand passing on him because he appears to be a project himself. However if a top QB we are high on falls to us I hope we consider taking them. I’ll cheer for whoever we get, and I would love Sewell if that’s the pick, but Darnold went from 3 over all to being traded for a future second and late round picks for a reason... I’m just a fan of doubling down to increase our odds of getting our franchise QB now vs having a constant revolving door at the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...