Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints might be trading ahead of us


Tbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

How come nobody complains about that pesky 3 game win streak when they harp on that WFT win? Are they somehow different?

Or shutting out Detroit. If Tepper wasn't so incompetent we could have scored negative points. smh

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Yes, because we still were in contention at that point and Teddy hadn't shown how horribly inept he was at that point.  At Washington, the season was over, qe were out of contention, most everyone was already over Teddy and ready to move on, and we literally had nothing to gain by winning that.

 

 What about that LIon win? That made us 4-7. We were out of it by then. Why is it always the WFT win?

 

Recency bias. It was our last win. So it was a stupid win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

 What about that LIon win? That made us 4-7. We were out of it by then. Why is it always the WFT win?

 

Recency bias. It was our last win. So it was a stupid win.

It is so embarrassing these little scrub nuts keep complaining about those wins as if they can suggest an alternative measure for professionals.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sean Payton is kind of Petty (Remember drafting Tommy Stevenson in the 7th last year cuz we wanted him as a UDFA). He would love to move up and make sure we miss out on Fields or being able to trade back and gain picks. Especially if he gains a franchise QB. Imagine Fields sitting while Winston throws his 4th Int before halftime of the season opener. Payton would walk over and say, "so that's what not to do in that situation!"

What a learning experience for a young QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

 What about that LIon win? That made us 4-7. We were out of it by then. Why is it always the WFT win?

 

Recency bias. It was our last win. So it was a stupid win.

No it wasn't recency bias...  I dont think we were mathematically eliminated against the Lions, and there was hope because PJ looked better.

The Washington win was absolutely pointless all the way around.  It was the latest win in the season where the outcome of the season as already cemented.  

I'm not sure where you're trying to go with this argument?  If you want to argue we shoundt have beat the Lions instead of Washington, have at it.  But, the season was over when we played Washington, against our former coach, and Rhule, as much as I like him so far, trotted Bridgewater out there who was hot garbage but just good enough to beat our former mediocre coach and his unprepared football team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

It is so embarrassing these little scrub nuts keep complaining about those wins as if they can suggest an alternative measure for professionals.

Scrub nuts?  Nice.

An alternative would've been starting Grier.  If he wins, that game is a lot more palatable and tolerable.  Going there with a proven loser who just happened to avoid just enough of his usual horrible mistakes to win a game that only hurt us cost us far more than we gained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Scrub nuts?  Nice.

An alternative would've been starting Grier.  If he wins, that game is a lot more palatable and tolerable.  Going there with a proven loser who just happened to avoid just enough of his usual horrible mistakes to win a game that only hurt us cost us far more than we gained.

You can follow Doug Pederson, he seems to be your type. If he ever coaches again. Complaining about a team winning is fugging embarrassing dog. Seriously, go suck on a pacifier. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Peppers90 NC said:

You can follow Doug Pederson, he seems to be your type. If he ever coaches again. Complaining about a team winning is fugging embarrassing dog. Seriously, go suck on a pacifier. 

I would give you infinity pie if I could.  Unfortunately I'm all out.  I owe you my friend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Scrub nuts?  Nice.

An alternative would've been starting Grier.  If he wins, that game is a lot more palatable and tolerable.  Going there with a proven loser who just happened to avoid just enough of his usual horrible mistakes to win a game that only hurt us cost us far more than we gained.

 

What did we lose? We are picking at 8. We are going to get a really good player. 

 

Treating the win at WFT like it cost us a generational type player is funny to me. We are not going to fall off the end of the world picking at 8 instead of 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

You can follow Doug Pederson, he seems to be your type. If he ever coaches again. Complaining about a team winning is fugging embarrassing dog. Seriously, go suck on a pacifier. 

Lol, okay.  Thanks for the discussion.  Enjoy the Falcons getting another franchise QB and the Saints stealing a franchise tackle from us because 5 wins compared to 4 separates the badasses from the pussies apparently.  

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go find my pacifier.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...