Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 2 Possibilities


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Soul Rebel said:

Moehrig could be BPA as crazy as it would be for us to go CB/SAF. 

Jenkins or Radunz is who I want. Jenkins would probably need a trade up in front of Cincy who went Chase over Sewell. 

I hope some QB needy teams move up early in R2 maybe for Mills/Mond.

Scary---I agree.

We could say, "Lets have the best secondary in the NFL and work on the OL in the third-sixth rounds.  Not what I would do, but  Moehrig is special.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I bet he is atop their board.  However, if they take another defensive player, if I am Brady, I punch Fitterer and Rhule in the chops and walk out.  That is what I do-

I get it. But I'm much more confident in our offense than your defense. The offense wasn't as bad as it should have been last year with Teddy B at the helm and no CMC. I feel like we're in much better shape on offense than the Huddle thinks. I do believe we could use an OT & C but we definitely need a FS with our defensive scheme.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dex said:

I get it. But I'm much more confident in our offense than your defense. The offense wasn't as bad as it should have been last year with Teddy B at the helm and no CMC. I feel like we're in much better shape on offense than the Huddle thinks. I do believe we could use an OT & C but we definitely need a FS with our defensive scheme.

And they can find OL in the third-sixth.  Senior bowl had a lot of those late-round players--a lot of them. 

I am also guessing they think we are OK at T and G for now...

There are 2-3 WRs who could grab the attention of Fitterer.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Everyone talks about how important it is to draft a QB in round 1 and have the "5th year option" I haven't seen it play out the well over the past several years. The good/great QB' aren't playing the first 5 years under their original deal.  After year 3 or 4 they are getting mammoth extensions. Having Penix take over in year 3 may actually save the Falcons some money over the next 5 seasons. I doubt they'd give him an extension after his first year as a starter if he took over the starting position after the guaranteed portion of Kurt Cousins new deal ends in 2025.   In terms of playing time, Penix 3 years as a starter would be ending with the 5th year of his rookie deal (assuming his option was picked up). The money Penix would be making in year 5 of a rookie contract would be significantly less than the upper echelon 5 year starters are making now.  
    • I mean you can see it in his highlights - he has CBs from Yale and Colgate in his hip pocket.  Yes he's making contested catches and moving the chains, but those aren't even P4 CBs and he's struggling to separate. 
    • Working for a season under Adam Thielen (another undrafted WR) should be a positive factor.  Some of these issues are correctable.  Many kids from small schools not only lack experience against DI schools, they lack the coaching that develops talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...