Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2021 Offensive Line: Finally Some Answers (or more questions)?


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Moo Daeng said:

Don't forget the UDFA guard out of Grambling, Moore.

That kid can become a monster. Just needs a lot of polish. It takes more than "Hulk Smash" to win in the big league. Of course, being able to Hulk Smash-it will really help!

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Camp Battles along the offensive line are going to be something to watch. I am interested in the Rookies and Erving and Elf. The situations with Erving and Elf remind me of Sam Darnold. It seems Rhule likes bringing in guys with something to prove. These Guys were 1st round picks and are good athletes that didn't get it done (for whatever reason) their last stops. They were rated super low last year (like Darnold), but have high ceilings. It will be interesting if they live up to their potential. There's more than one attempted turn around going on in Carolina.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, stbugs said:

Why do people have Miller starting over Erving and Elflein? We didn’t give them $14M guaranteed to sit behind a guy we paid $1M for 1 year. They could bomb but right now I’d assume it’s:

T - Christensen and Moton

G - Elflein and Erving

C - Paradis

I’d think backups will be Scott, Brown, Daley, Moore and Miller. Maybe Little will make it. I could see Miller getting cut if Brown and Moore look solid.

I think the guy with the best chance at jumping into the lineup is Moore. If Christensen can’t handle LT, then I think Scott jumps back in or maybe Erving slides there.

 

I suspect Scott ends up starting the majority of games for us. I still believe it might be a bridge too far for Christensen. 

I damn sure hope I am wrong. I will rescind every critical comment about Fitt and Rhule's offseason if they nail a very good LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Trainwreck said:

LT: Eric Fisher, Greg Little, Brady Christensen 

LG: Deonte Brown, Dennis Daley

OC: Matt Paradis, Pat Elflein 

RG: David Moore, John Miller

RT: Taylor Moton, Cam Erving

Would love Fisher on a super cheap 2 year deal, let him sit out this year then prove it the next. Why no? we got plenty of money. Worth the gamble, could easily cut.

Edited by Jared Patterson
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davos, good thread.  This is going to be fun.  We are 3 deep at every position, but only Moton is a stellar--that is OK and here is why:

With CMC able to motion out, with a slot like Sli or Moore, with WRs on the outside like Anderson, Moore, and Marshall--and a TE that can run routes and catch (Arnold) and another that can punish blitzers or help on the edge--we have so many ways to offset their attempt to exploit our Offensive front.

At LT, Christensen will need time to develop and add technique--with short arms, your footwork and technique are critically important.  Were we terrible with Scott?  Meh., but with a blocking FB/TE/headhunter, I feel better about it.  Irving, Scott, and maybe hope Little improves.  If not, hope Christensen is ready soon.  We still have 4 options there right now. 

At G?  We have 2 LGs who can play.  Daley and Elflein--both better than Reed and that other guy we tried there last year----MOST OF THE PROBLEMS ON THE LEFT SIDE were due to DCs exploiting the high turnover, scrub filled LT and LG when OKung went down, Reed was exposed.  Elflein is better.  Note:  Deonte Brown played both LG and RG in college and can pull.  He needs to drop another 20 lbs and he can start on either side.  He is VERY good. 

At C?  Not a Paradis fan, but he is a veteran and smart.  He needs 2 studs beside him.  I am very happy we signed the G from Grambling from the SR bowl--I watched him and was blown away--low center of gravity and good feet.  His anchor was incredible.  I could not help but wonder, CAN HE PLAY CENTER? Stay tuned.

I used to coach OL and I was sitting at a conference talking to EZ Smith from Concord one day--a very good OL coach.  We were buddies, and I used to pick his brain (I was in my 20s).  And I know HS is a little different from the pros, but he said something I never forgot:  "You can deal with 1 weak OL, but you can't hide 2."  Last year, we had 2 weak OL and 2 average OL and one stud for most of the year. 

I would say that Miller was our second best OL--he played beside Moton.  That helps.  Paradis played between average and below average, so he did OK.  the LG played beside crap, and the LT played beside the LG, also crap.

So where are we going to be improved:  LT, LG, C (if flanked by better players) and LG.  We have better players at both guard spots coming in as rookies.  We addressed LT. 
 

So we are already better if you look at the 5 OL.  But add CMC's range, a blocking headhunter like Tremble, an additional threat at WR--and we will be much improved.  Giggity.

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
    • I thought victory Mondays was pretty standard 
×
×
  • Create New...