Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offseason Breaking non-news


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Sorry folks, I'm not sold on our DC yet. We might have been undermanned out there, but that defense played soft as hell throughout the year. We couldn't get people off the field on third down. We were vulnerable underneath, over the top and all over the middle of the field.

While there were some good individual performances, that defense was lucky to walk out at 5-11. 

Snow, whether they say it or not, is on the hot seat. He'd better not melt this year. The guy coached like an old lady with a division III team. That's just not going to cut it in the NFL.

I have said that I am going to be positive and look to the future and not focus on the past. It is too depressing. All I will say is that you aren't wrong and the scheme was awful. I have faith that since Snow has experience in the NFL as a DC now and has seen some great defensive units and has had time to make changes to better utilize the talent that he has, he will have a more aggressive scheme and put more pressure on opposing offenses. I surely hope he has retired the 3-5-3 prevent defense and will mix up the rushes and scheme to be more deceptive and harder to scheme against. He is going to see a traditionally very aggressive defense when we scrimmage Baltimore. I hope he is taking notes during the scrimmages. That is the kind of defense I hope we can grow into.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Sorry folks, I'm not sold on our DC yet. We might have been undermanned out there, but that defense played soft as hell throughout the year. We couldn't get people off the field on third down. We were vulnerable underneath, over the top and all over the middle of the field.

While there were some good individual performances, that defense was lucky to walk out at 5-11. 

Snow, whether they say it or not, is on the hot seat. He'd better not melt this year. The guy coached like an old lady with a division III team. That's just not going to cut it in the NFL.

Remember what the D did to the league MVP last year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Sorry folks, I'm not sold on our DC yet. We might have been undermanned out there, but that defense played soft as hell throughout the year. We couldn't get people off the field on third down. We were vulnerable underneath, over the top and all over the middle of the field.

While there were some good individual performances, that defense was lucky to walk out at 5-11. 

Snow, whether they say it or not, is on the hot seat. He'd better not melt this year. The guy coached like an old lady with a division III team. That's just not going to cut it in the NFL.

Man, I could not disagree here more. Yes you are correct in saying the defense was terrible on 3rd down. But we all expected that. We regularly started 4 rookies on defense for most of the season. We had a backup caliber MLB who could not cover anyone in the middle of the field and poor safeties covering down field to help our CBs. That problem has been thoroughly addressed this offseason. But I feel our defense tremendously overperformed for what we had. I expected us to have a decent offense last year but one of the worst defenses in the entire league. Snow REALLY impressed me last year. I figured our only shot of winning games would be outscoring our opponents. At least that side of the ball had established talent where our defense had virtually none heading into last season. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I get what you are saying, but he had no other option than to try to keep everything in front of our young guys and hope for a turnover or missed play by the other team. At one time we had SO3, Franklin, Pride, Roy, YGM, Brown, and Chinn all on the field as rookies plus Whitehead in the middle and Boston whiffing on tackles. When DJax was hurt that defense had no business stopping an NFL offense from a talent standpoint.

The one game where they played all out on defense and were super aggressive was against the Lions. We shut them out and won the game. Not every opponent we faced was the Lions, but quite a few were of that level... our wins were too close and our losses were even closer. Just a bit more aggression and faith in his players would have made a huge difference is all I am really saying. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, SBBlue said:

When you're outmanned, you don't play man.  We didn't have the manpower to play tight coverage.  We do now.  

They played soft across the entire defense. We weren't exactly stopping the running games either...

They were soft. The defensive game plan was soft. We had multiple games where the opposing team never had to make their punter get off the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ladypanther said:

Remember what the D did to the league MVP last year.  

Got five sacks, but gave up 145 on the ground to Aaron Jones? They made that day tough on Rodgers, but he still grabbed the win. In truth, it was one of our better defensive outings against a top notch opponent. We lost it because Joey Slye ended up being our highest scorer when we couldn't keep moving in the opponent's side of the field. That rests squarely on the offense.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Man, I could not disagree here more. Yes you are correct in saying the defense was terrible on 3rd down. But we all expected that. We regularly started 4 rookies on defense for most of the season. We had a backup caliber MLB who could not cover anyone in the middle of the field and poor safeties covering down field to help our CBs. That problem has been thoroughly addressed this offseason. But I feel our defense tremendously overperformed for what we had. I expected us to have a decent offense last year but one of the worst defenses in the entire league. Snow REALLY impressed me last year. I figured our only shot of winning games would be outscoring our opponents. At least that side of the ball had established talent where our defense had virtually none heading into last season. 

I get you, but whatever the reason, playing timid loses you games. And they really don't accept excuses before the game and spot points to the team with the underperforming players.

I hope Snow has the guys, has the plan and has the success this season, I really do. I see the potential is there for certain, and there are some future stars out there, but you and I both know that if they come out soft again this year, Snow is going to be asked to fall on his sword. He really has to go out and make his team fight for it. He won't make it another year if they're just deployed as speed bumps again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Got five sacks, but gave up 145 on the ground to Aaron Jones? They made that day tough on Rodgers, but he still grabbed the win. In truth, it was one of our better defensive outings against a top notch opponent. We lost it because Joey Slye ended up being our highest scorer when we couldn't keep moving in the opponent's side of the field. That rests squarely on the offense.

 

Yep...offense lost that one. (Loved the way Rogers looked at the end of that game.)  I am just saying, the defense had some flashes with a very young roster.  I think any DC would have had quite the challenge last year. Considering what he had to work with, I think Snow had to be creative at times and did ok.  This year we will see what he can do.  I tend to be a glass half full person.   There is more talent, last years rookies have experience...I am expecting some good things from this defense.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ladypanther said:

Yep...offense lost that one. (Loved the way Rogers looked at the end of that game.)  I am just saying, the defense had some flashes with a very young roster.  I think any DC would have had quite the challenge last year. Considering what he had to work with, I think Snow had to be creative at times and did ok.  This year we will see what he can do.  I tend to be a glass half full person.   There is more talent, last years rookies have experience...I am expecting some good things from this defense.

I think you're right and I want the season to prove that's the case. Sure would be nice to be the defensive force in the NFCSouth once again.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

We weren't exactly stopping the running games either...

I agree.  As bad as we were against the run, it improved from 2019, even after the loss of Luke, Bradberry and loading up the the D with rookies.

Quote

 We had multiple games where the opposing team never had to make their punter get off the bench. 

 It was bad, but once again we improved from 2019 in this category as well.  

We declined against the passing game, whether you measure by  yards, tds or 1st downs.  Considering our secondary was a bunch a rookies with Boston at safety, in a division with TB, Matt Ryan and Drew Brees 2x  and Matt Stafford on the schedule, it is amazing we weren't dead last.

Expecting the D to do better with rookies replacing Luke and Bradberry is a very high bar, I was expecting it to be worse, but in key categories like rushing yards and 1st downs we actually IMPROVED with rookies.  

People seem to forget how bad the 2019 RR run defense sucked.

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

 but you and I both know that if they come out soft again this year, Snow is going to be asked to fall on his sword.

They aren't going soft this year again.  Horn , Bouye and even Taylor are man/press corners.  Adding Reddick, Fox, Jones and Dixon is going to help get to the QB.   Its clear from what he has said and from what we have acquired that we are going to tighten up, probably on 3rd and 4th downs.

 Perryman will help with the run D problem....he needs to stay healthy though, he has an injury history and we have a deep drop off in talent when he's out.

Quote

He won't make it another year if they're just deployed as speed bumps again.

That would shock me.  The D played far beyond expectations last year, shutting out Stafford and limiting Rogers.   Improving in key metrics with rookies after loss of some of our best vets.

Rhule has carried Snow everywhere with him and he turned around those teams with great D's.  Baylor and Temple were not offensive powerhouses.

I would be surprised if Snow goes soft again this year.

Even if the D doesn't perform, I'd be surprised if Rhule let him go.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SBBlue said:

I would be surprised if Snow goes soft again this year.

Even if the D doesn't perform, I'd be surprised if Rhule let him go.

There is NO CHANCE of either of these 2 things happening.

Our weaknesses were identified and addressed, in the Draft and in FA.

Our run defense will be vastly improved with the DT rotation we've now got, and the exponentially better Perryman in the middle, compared to that toreador we put out there last year (you could hear him yell, "Ole!", as the RBs ran by.)

As for PD, the new version will in no way resemble last year's.  Our pass rush will be fearsome, from every angle of attack, forcing quicker releases to WRs who will now be bumped off their routes.  This leads to tipped passes, INTs, and -- most of all -- far fewer of those long drives and frustrating 3rd conversions that our prevent defenses were bound to surrender.

This year, there will be no surrender.  By season's end, our D will be the talk of the league.  Our average PPG allowed will be <20.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
×
×
  • Create New...