Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 Carolina Panthers players facing an uphill battle at training camp


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

That dude was also otherworldly strong. I am not sure Brown is that guy.

Good point though.

Larry Allen strong, probably not. Hell, Larry Allen might be the strongest man in NFL history where pretty much every lineman is straight up freak of nature strong. But Deonte Brown is REALLY strong. Derrick Brown is freakishly strong and there's a video that I can't find right now of Deonte Brown pretty much picking him up and escorting him five yards downfield like he was a child when they were both in college.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

Grier just doesn't look as if he belongs anywhere near the NFL. Nothing personal against the guy - most of us don't. I just think we'd be better off looking elsewhere for depth at the position. (probably at both spots if we're keeping 3 QBs - I'd rather we just keep 2 though.)

Yep. Seems like a great dude. He's just not an NFL talent. It's amazing what he was able to accomplish at WVU. Hats off to that staff based on what I've seen from him outside of that system. When we drafted him, I didn't hate the pick. I didn't particularly like it, but I thought he'd end up being one of those good backup/marginal starter types. Nope. He's terrible by NFL standards. Not NFL starter standards, NFL third stringer standards.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not necessarily. Locker room impact comes into play. Coachability comes into play. If both guys are liabilities and we're talking about pocket lint in terms of cap implications, I'm going with the more coachable guy who is best in the locker room.

At the end of the day, I think there's a decent chance that there's at least one OL on our final roster that comes off the waiver wire when other teams start paring down their rosters.

If they are different in the locker room or more or less coachable then they really aren’t equal. My only point was there are some cap savings to releasing him where others misread the cap sites  and think there is not.

Also saving a million here and a few million there adds up.  It can be the difference between resigning a Shaq instead of a Bradberry.

Also I wouldn’t get your hopes up too much for waiver help.  Decent OT help is rare to find and we have some bodies at guard especially if Christensen gets some reps there.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

If they are different in the locker room or more or less coachable then they really aren’t equal. My only point was there are some cap savings to releasing him where others misread the cap sites  and think there is not.

Also saving a million here and a few million there adds up.  It can be the difference between resigning a Shaq instead of a Bradberry.

Also I wouldn’t get your hopes up too much for waiver help.  Decent OT help is rare to find and we have some bodies at guard especially if Christensen gets some reps there.

 

 

 

I don't think we'll need "decent" to upgrade our depth. Simply not atrocious might end up being enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I think, quite unfortunately, the staff is hyper fixated on versatility to the detriment of actual ability. 

That might be a bit overplayed around here.  

Here is an article where Rhule talks about versatility.  Basically he says your top 5-6 lineman need to do what they do best.  After that you have to look for some versatility.

Honestly that is fairly standard.  Even if a team keeps 9-10 lineman on the roster they might only have 8 active for games days.

After your starting 5 you probably want a swing tackle, a guy that can play T/G and a guy that can play G/C.  Players 9 and 10 might be a guy that you don't expect to have active on game day but you don't want to expose on the practice squad.

For example, lets say our starting 5 is Erving, Elflein, Paradis, Miller, and Moton.  (best guess at this point).

Scott as swing tackle.  Christensen at G/T.  Honestly I'm not sure who can fill in at center, but I find it a bit curious that Elflein was drafted as a center so maybe he moves over and someone else fills in at guard.  Also could he possible move to Center if Paradis isn't resigned?

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AU-panther said:

That might be a bit overplayed around here.  

Here is an article where Rhule talks about versatility.  Basically he says your top 5-6 lineman need to do what they do best.  After that you have to look for some versatility.

Honestly that is fairly standard.  Even if a team keeps 9-10 lineman on the roster they might only have 8 active for games days.

After your starting 5 you probably want a swing tackle, a guy that can play T/G and a guy that can play G/C.  Players 9 and 10 might be a guy that you don't expect to have active on game day but you don't want to expose on the practice squad.

For example, lets say our starting 5 is Erving, Elflein, Paradis, Miller, and Moton.  (best guess at this point).

Scott as swing tackle.  Christensen at G/T.  Honestly I'm not sure who can fill in at center, but I find it a bit curious that Elflein was drafted as a center so maybe he moves over and someone else fills in at guard.  Also could he possible move to Center if Paradis isn't resigned?

 

Your sample starting five includes two backup OL brought in for their supposed versatility. Frankly, Miller is a backup OL, as well. 

That was generally most of my issue with our offseason. We piled up backup OL when we actually needed at least 3 starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Your sample starting five includes two backup OL brought in for their supposed versatility. Frankly, Miller is a backup OL, as well. 

That was generally most of my issue with our offseason. We piled up backup OL when we actually needed at least 3 starters.

Versatility is coach speak a lot of times, trying to sell a player to fans.

I don’t disagree with you, I’m not overly excited with our additions.  Based on history we gave out some decent contracts to guys who aren’t that regarded.

This idea though that the staff is purposely passing on better players at single positions for more versatile  players that are worse at all the positions is a bit overplayed .

Im sure they had an actual position in mind for Erving and Elfin when they signed them.  I’m not sold on the idea they will be good but that is a different conversation. I will say though that Elflein was a pretty regarded center prospect coming out of college and I’m curious to see how that plays out, I think this is Paradis last year if I’m not mistaken.

Also on game days a lot of teams only have 8  offensive lineman active so you do need versatility. With only 3 back ups for 5 starting spots the math works that way.  Every team has versatile lineman for this reason, Rhule is just making it a talking point and fans are running with it.

I think in reality it’s far more likely that they just signed bad players than some stupid methodology of them only chasing versatility. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, AU-panther said:

could happen, I could also see Moore going to PS.

Sometimes when trying to figure this out it helps to look at contracts and draft positions.  Right or wrong teams do sometimes feel invested in draft picks, especially higher ones.

Locks:

Moton (because he is good)

Erving (larger contract)

Elflein (larger contract)

Paradis (larger contract)

Christensen (higher draft pick by this staff)

Really good chance of making it:

Scott ($730k signing bonus for this year, tells me someone like him)

 

That leaves Little, Moore, Brown, Daley, and Miller for 3-4 spots.

Little - Has some measurables, I think this staff likes measurables that might help him.  He was a higher draft pick, but I think he was a Hurney pick, that might hurt him.  Sometimes new GMS and coaches like to distance themselves from other picks made by earlier people.

Moore - UDFA, seems like a PS candidate.  Would love for him to be our next Norwell, history just tells us that isn't likely.

Brown - Draft pick by current staff, could help, but it was a lower pick.  I think there is a lot of potential there, especially if he gets into shape.  If he does play well in training camp and preseason might be more afraid to put him on practice squad, might get poached.

Daley - Limited snaps last year, showed some potential.  Easy contract to cut.

Miller - Saw a lot of snaps last year.  Easy contract to cut but with all of the new guys and young guys the fact he saw a lot of action last year should help him. 

Right now if I had to guess which they keep, I would probably go with Miller, Brown, and Daley.

Moore to PS and Little cut.  Honestly though none of them have a huge commitment tied to them so it really will come down to how they play in training camp and preseason.

Also I wouldn't get to strict with the 4G and 4T split.  I could see a couple of the guys listed as either.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think Daley can be a player…if he can stay on the field

he was pretty good when healthy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Versatility is coach speak a lot of times, trying to sell a player to fans.

I don’t disagree with you, I’m not overly excited with our additions.  Based on history we gave out some decent contracts to guys who aren’t that regarded.

This idea though that the staff is purposely passing on better players at single positions for more versatile  players that are worse at all the positions is a bit overplayed .

Im sure they had an actual position in mind for Erving and Elfin when they signed them.  I’m not sold on the idea they will be good but that is a different conversation. I will say though that Elflein was a pretty regarded center prospect coming out of college and I’m curious to see how that plays out, I think this is Paradis last year if I’m not mistaken.

Also on game days a lot of teams only have 8  offensive lineman active so you do need versatility. With only 3 back ups for 5 starting spots the math works that way.  Every team has versatile lineman for this reason, Rhule is just making it a talking point and fans are running with it.

I think in reality it’s far more likely that they just signed bad players than some stupid methodology of them only chasing versatility. 

IMO, it's that they believe in their ability to turn these guys into something they likely aren't. Let's be honest, rare are the stories of journeyman backup OL and busts that go from team to team in the NFL and then suddenly become above average players. Hence my general dislike for the Erving and Elflein signings. Had we signed them as backup OL, I'd have completely different feelings but IMO they were signed to start(or at least compete to start). 

I feel similarly about Christensen. He's a guy that looks great when you see his RAS but his film isn't exactly outstanding. To that point, our hopes of him becoming our future LT appear to have dimmed a little. Which, in fairness, the "news" coming from the organization leads us to believe they thought more highly of him as an OG anyway. 

I think they appear to place a very high value on athletic ability and raw potential. I believe that makes a lot of sense if you are a college coach but in the NFL everyone is a great athlete and has potential. That's my general theory on why we make some of the moves that we do(and did). 

But, perhaps they just have the special sauce like Pete Carroll did and can motivate these guys into being champions. We will see in the next few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...