Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BR's list of most overpaid players on every team


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Pot, meet Mr. Kettle. How about adding oh I don't know, maybe some actual content? I mean, other than Shaq contract bad, so Shaq bad. 

 

I have an idea. Why don't you read what @Icegewrote about Shaq. It's on page 2 of the Jermain Carter thread. Maybe try educating yourself. Nah, that ain't your style.

 

I have been on this board for approx 13years. And I try my best to not give ill will towards anyone. But you and your ilk, who jump into threads throwing shade at posts, really have made it difficult. You act like your shitt don't stink. Well buddy, your shitt does stink.

 

There are only like 2 dozen regular fans left on this board. And it is because of you and your ilk driving them away with your snark, and ego driven posts, filled with holier than thou attitudes.

 

Hellz, the Trolls are at least entertaining. 

 

I said Shaq was a decent starting LB. No more, no less. Then you came with... well, exactly what you're accusing me of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, onmyown said:

The facts need to be laid out for you? These players have a history and it’s not starting caliber compared to the rest of the NFL. Paradis will be gone next year and he and Miller did not play well, he played average. All spots on the line have a history of below average play except Moton.
 

You’re saying get a group of below average players and a rookies together and assume they’ll gel all while fighting for the LT spot and all of a sudden they’ll become serviceable is more sweeping statement based on nothing that saying it appears based on their history of below average play their play will be below average.  

 

21 minutes ago, onmyown said:

The facts need to be laid out for you? These players have a history and it’s not starting caliber compared to the rest of the NFL. Paradis will be gone next year and he and Miller did not play well, he played average. All spots on the line have a history of below average play except Moton.
 

You’re saying get a group of below average players and a rookies together and assume they’ll gel all while fighting for the LT spot and all of a sudden they’ll become serviceable is more sweeping statement based on nothing that saying it appears based on their history of below average play their play will be below average.  

 

Yada yada yada. None of that has anything to do with what I said. But hey, that's a Huddle staple. 

 

The right side of our Oline did play better than the left. Which means, Paradis, Miller, and Moton did play well together. LAST YEAR.

 

Putting BChris at LG gives us only 1 spot left to fill. THIS YEAR.

 

We have Tremble to help whomever wins LT. THIS YEAR.

 

You saying that line has no chance, before they have even hit the practice field? Is just lazy.

 

It may fail. But I am at least willing to wait until they play to pronounce the line hit or miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I said Shaq was a decent starting LB. No more, no less. Then you came with... well, exactly what you're accusing me of. 

 

If you truly believe that is ALL you said. 

 

Hellz dude, you have 2 post in this thread alone where you disparage him, all because of the contract. You can't seem to separate the player from that God awful contract.

 

I can't continue this. You  will NEVER admit to anything. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

 

If you truly believe that is ALL you said. 

 

Hellz dude, you have 2 post in this thread alone where you disparage him, all because of the contract. You can't seem to separate the player from that God awful contract.

 

I can't continue this. You  will NEVER admit to anything. 

I said his play isn't worthy of his contract. It's not. He's a decent player paid like an All-Pro. That isn't disparagement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I said his play isn't worthy of his contract. It's not. He's a decent player paid like an All-Pro. That isn't disparagement.

 

Yup, that's all you said. End of message, the end, by by. For someone who believes his word should be taken as holy writ. You sure have a hard time remembering what you did say.

 

Again, take 10 minutes from you busy day, and read what @Icegewrote about Shaq in the Jermain Carter thread. It's on page 2, go for it.

 

Shaq is more valuable than most Huddlers realize. Because of that contract, and a bias from years ago. They can't see the forest for the trees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is going to be interesting to see how this plays out. Do the Panthers just out and out release him, and save some money? Or do they figure out a way to keep him, by figuring out a way to make that contract more team friendly?

 

I believe Shaq is one of the best athletes on the team. And I think they will try to work something out to be able to keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Yup, that's all you said. End of message, the end, by by. For someone who believes his word should be taken as holy writ. You sure have a hard time remembering what you did say.

 

Again, take 10 minutes from you busy day, and read what @Icegewrote about Shaq in the Jermain Carter thread. It's on page 2, go for it.

 

Shaq is more valuable than most Huddlers realize. Because of that contract, and a bias from years ago. They can't see the forest for the trees.

Quote what you have an issue with. Good grief, man. Your homerism triggers you into irrationality and borderline delusions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

It is going to be interesting to see how this plays out. Do the Panthers just out and out release him, and save some money? Or do they figure out a way to keep him, by figuring out a way to make that contract more team friendly?

 

I believe Shaq is one of the best athletes on the team. And I think they will try to work something out to be able to keep him.

What are you talking about? If he's such a great player on a contract that adequately reflects his play, what's the problem? Why would we be discussing potentially releasing him? It's almost as if you're coming around to the opinions you've been so diligently arguing against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Quote what you have an issue with. Good grief, man. Your homerism triggers you into irrationality and borderline delusions.

 

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What are you talking about? If he's such a great player on a contract that adequately reflects his play, what's the problem? Why would we be discussing potentially releasing him? It's almost as if you're coming around to the opinions you've been so diligently arguing against.

 

You obviously did not read what @Icegewrote. If taking 10 minutes of your time is asking too much.

 

I'm done with you. I let you get under my skin. That is on me. I will be going now. Go insult someone else please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As soon as I saw the title, I guessed they'd put Erving.

I have another thread with the research on this but  if Erving plays as well as he did last year, he was worth the contract.  If not well...

I think Shaq will be better this year, with more help all around him.   He'll never be Luke, but he can be good.  I still believe. 

I'd probably pick Eiflin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

I don't think you can find many, if any, folks that like that contract. But by the way some folks talk, half, if not more, of this board like it. Just one of the many "Facts" about Shaq that are based in opinion.

 

"He's just a jag, solid backup or STer at best, Shaq isn't tough enough, Shaq can't cover, Shaq is no TD, didn't live up to his #1 draft position, or my favorite "He never passed my eye test", and on, and on it goes.?

 

In the Jermain Carter thread, you put together a great rundown on what Shaq brings to the table. Do you think folks paid any attention to that? Heck no, that goes against their preconceived notions.

 

To too many folks. Shaq's contract bad, which automatically makes Shaq bad. 

 

It truly appears that to the Huddle, opinion means more than facts.

tb100 that's a big reason why I just put folks on ignore and keep it moving now after throwing up a wall of (researched) text. The people that can see the stats and still try to force a false narrative aren't worth the time because the only thing that's going to matter to them is what they believe rather than what they know.

Screaming into the void that is the Huddlers Of Emotion (aka HOEs 👀) just isn't worth it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feels like we are in a pretty good cap situation right now.  Shaq’s salary is a little bloated, agree there but at he least he is a decent starter.  CMC needs to stay healthy and get back to being CMC this season or that deal turns into another cautionary tale about RBs and big deals.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I said his play isn't worthy of his contract. It's not. He's a decent player paid like an All-Pro. That isn't disparagement.

No, it's not.

I don't like to pile on, but Thompson gets my vote too.

Thompson's contract isn't his fault any more than McCaffrey's is his, but they exist, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...