Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers game notes


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

You know you are bad when you are replaced by Greg Little. 

I mean how bad is Greg Little... we really don't know.. at times he looks functional when he's on the field. But the problem is that's rarely like a 2 game stretch. If little is available he's probably better than scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean how bad is Greg Little... we really don't know.. at times he looks functional when he's on the field. But the problem is that's rarely like a 2 game stretch. If little is available he's probably better than scott.

If he was better than Scott he would be available.   Chicken/egg thing.  Scott has been world's better.   Today, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

If he was better than Scott he would be available.   Chicken/egg thing.  Scott has been world's better.   Today, not so much.

Two different things... availability and active play skill. When avaliable I think we attempted to start Little... and Scott hasn't been world's better when both are ACTIVE. Which I know is key.. but you not gonna play the worse guy if both are avaliable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

— The Panthers went into the game with just 56 available players.

They held out all the starters after a vigorous couple of joint practices with the Colts, with the first team getting around 55 or 60 snaps of live action (which is around what they'd get in a regular-season game)

https://www.panthers.com/news/rapid-reactions-panthers-get-big-plays-from-rookies

Excellent stuff.  Loved the 2nd team efforts (for most).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You got that right  on replays, you could clearly see the Rams  oline holding over and over and over again 
    • Careful.... you put him in the Louvre, he will get stolen.....
    • Because you don't bring in competition if you're paying your QB 27m. Look at what we did with Darnold and Mayfield. He's either your guy or he isn't. Hes not playing on the final year and most agents aren't going to let a 5th year stand. They'll push for the extension now. If we're willing to do the 5th year, why aren't we willing to do the extension? That's why I didn't care what the win loss record was this year. We needed to know if Bryce is the franchise QB or not. At the end of the year we have to make a decision that locks us in to Bryce for the next 5 or we move on. Now maybe his agent doesn't play hard ball with the Panthers, but I don't see that happening. Most likely we decide Bryce's future in Carolina at the end of this season. Extend, trade or cut. That's the most likely scenario based on history. Bryce's play over the past 3 years, are you paying him 50m a season? And who are you letting walk to do it? Give Bryce his extension and Icky is all but gone. Can't pay everyone on that line and there are too many bonuses that will be accelerated. It's not so simple as just play him on the 5th year. 
×
×
  • Create New...