Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Snack


Newbie
 Share

Recommended Posts

I didn’t expect much from Phil Hoskins and figured they picked him off his measurable not his collegiate play. I figured we’d put him on the practice squad and try to develop him into a serviceable player. Is it just me or did Big Snack look pretty good today? I think this guy could help us and I’m pretty excited about his upside.  
 

I can’t find much about him anywhere. Does anyone have the game stats or have any information on him? Am I crazy here or do other huddlers think he could make the team and contribute?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I thought he looked promising, though I also think on some of those penetrations he wasn't being disciplined with his gap assignment. The runner ended up hitting the hole he'd vacated. That's coachable though.

That’s an interesting take and thanks for responding. At the very least, it sounds like you think there’s something to work with. I’ll take upside potential from a 7th rounder all day. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I thought he looked promising, though I also think on some of those penetrations he wasn't being disciplined with his gap assignment. The runner ended up hitting the hole he'd vacated. That's coachable though.

That was one of the knocks on him I remember reading somewhere after we drafted him. But like you said, that’s coachable 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

He had some good reps out there, albeit against mostly undrafted guys.

Can only see him making the roster though if the coaches choose him over a pure pass rusher like Christian Miller to have more interior guys.

You got Burns/Reddick/Fox/YGM/Haynes and Brown/Jones/Roy/Nixon, I think I'd take Hoskins for rotational/injury value over Miller. Fox and YGM can play inside and out though so it's tricky. Hoskins looked better than Nixon from what i've seen today if they're planning on 3-4 looks

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule/Snow's defense doesn't seem to be quite so ironclad about gap responsibility as Rivera's defenses. make of that what you will.

in that light Hoskins looked great, if I'm being honest. very powerful, a big frame so he was pretty natural maneuvering around trash at the LOS. he might be a keeper, though he might be on the practice squad to start things out. the numbers are getting tight on the defensive line.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was soooo spot on about everything from the board environment to the QB guru extremist terrible takes. I wish more people on this board would elevate their energy and knowledge so we could have a fun board again. Cheers to better Panther Fan Culture.
    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
×
×
  • Create New...