Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Controversy

CPsinceDay1

By CPsinceDay1,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

We're sitting at 12pages, and look you still engaged in using foul language just to get a point across, which was once again wrong, like so many other things you try to stay on the fence about...

Cause you were so right about PJ

A pretty sizable portion of those 12 pages is people calling you a dumbass.

On that point, there doesn't seem to be much controversy at all.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPsinceDay1 Proficient

CPsinceDay1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I think PJs stats are deceptive and he could still be a good backup IF he can learn to protect the ball a bit better.  I like his energy and willingness to push the ball down the field... It was a stark contrast to Teddy.

Not sold on Darnold as long term solution at QB1, but I'm hopeful. He has the physical tools.  Only question if he has it between his ears to play smart.

No qb controversy in Carolina anyway. Just a couple of Huddle threads.  When there's real controversy... It's much worse hahaah.

Did you see how the Sam Defenders jump in here as soon they found out the boy might play....

Why, cause they scared, scared he might not perform well, hell Grier might look better in game time action than Darnold

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
Just now, CPsinceDay1 said:

Darnold's past stretches over 3 years, never saw it in him, even before he was drafted...

Always liked PJ...

PJ is older then Sam and has worse efficiency numbers almost across the board. I don’t get the love. We all hope he can be a solid backup but even that’s not set in stone. He isn’t starter material at a 8.9% INT rate. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, CPsinceDay1 said:

Question who's the DUMBASS who said PJ wasn't a NFL QB...

rebecca-jack-black.gif

Igo, originally. But I agreed and still do.

At this point, we're still hoping that he develops into a solid backup. If someone who's already a solid backup becomes available, it wouldn't surprise me to see him gone.

But whether that happens or not, he has no shot of unseating Darnold as the starter. The mere suggestion of it is delusional and just plain stupid.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPsinceDay1 Proficient

CPsinceDay1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, CRA said:

The huddle exist in part to argue bad football takes until the cows come home. 

if you can’t do that without name calling you are going to get a vacation.    That’s the overdue warning.  

 

Exactly who are you talking about???

Because I've never called anyone out by name...but have received a fair amount of warnings for basically doing the exact same thing as some other huddlers...

Now if you Talking about mr.scot....it really doesn't bother me, my teacher always said those who are less intelligent can only remember so many words, I just took it he was home school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Madwolf Rising Star

Madwolf

Posted
Posted

As someone who is not certain if Darnold is going to be good, or get us a draft pick, there is still no doubt in my mind that PJ is solidly a backup. 

And we're having this conversation because he had a mediocre game against 2nd and 3rd stringers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, mav1234 said:

I think PJs stats are deceptive and he could still be a good backup IF he can learn to protect the ball a bit better.  I like his energy and willingness to push the ball down the field... It was a stark contrast to Teddy.

Not sold on Darnold as long term solution at QB1, but I'm hopeful. He has the physical tools.  Only question if he has it between his ears to play smart.

No qb controversy in Carolina anyway. Just a couple of Huddle threads.  When there's real controversy... It's much worse hahaah.

Hard to "play smart" when you have to play "Hero Ball" 100% of the time because you had ZERO weapons all around you in NY and had to deal with a nitwit as your Head Coach.

I think he'll be fine.  🙂

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Bryce Young #34 on Chris Simms' top 40 list

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Oh it's nothing elite, but we played without Horn last year.  Gilly playing at 80% is better than any CB2 we have had in a moment.  Luvu was fun, but he was out of position in Evero's defense.  Jewell is a tackling machine and has had over 100 in 3 of his last 4 with his highest being at Denver with Evero.  Pass Rushing and CBs are strong red flags but they also were last year.  On paper it's the same or maybe slightly better than last year and Evero had them keeping us in some games.  Hell our 2 wins were due to the defense and the kicking game.
    • mrcompletely11
      Bryce Young #34 on Chris Simms' top 40 list

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      I mean best case scenario is horn plays 15ish games, brown and clowney replicate last years stats, we sign gilmore and he reverts back to form after his injury but even then we still lack pass rush and our linebackers are dogshit.  And thats best case.  If horn goes down and if clowney starts showing his age then it could get ugly.  We are going to miss the tenacity of luvu.
    • ForJimmy
      Bryce Young #34 on Chris Simms' top 40 list

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Well you have year 2 of the new scheme so several players should be more comfortable.   Vs last year DL we added Robinson to play DE giving Brown a solid presence on the other side, plus he is familiar with Evero (I don't like Shy at NT but he was there last year too)  LB- Clowney and Wonnum are more complete/probably better than Burns and YGM, Jewell and Shaq are better than Luvu and whatever random guy from the streets we had playing last and again Jewell is familiar with Evero CB- This is a big red flag but vs last year we kept Hill at slot, we lost Henderson and replaced him with Jackson which seems like a wash to me.  If we can sign Gilly I will consider this upgraded but as of now it's a weakness and a wash Safety- Fuller replaces Bell as an upgrade who is also familiar with Evero.  I think we signed another vet in Scott as depth   Depth is still an issue no doubt but it looks slightly better on paper than last year IMO...
×
×
  • Create New...