Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Controversy


CPsinceDay1
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

Carolina All Day... Clearly there's something in the air against PJ, who's a member of the Carolina Panthers...I mean so many threads concerned with the backup QB, why, because it shows the lack of faith in Sam Darnold...once again passing on Fields, and now releasing Will, let's me know how much faith it is they have in PJ vs. how much they in Sam Darnold...like @CRA has stated they're not bringing in any QB, and it's because they don't want any real competition for Sam Darnold.

Darnold is a bargain chip...he was meant for insurance always...a decent backup..or trade bait should a certain QB legal problems disappear...had it been Fields,Darnold,PJ...there would be no Horn...and PJ possesses the same skill set as Fields so the understanding if Darnold sucks, homerun with PJ... Phillip went undrafted...off and on the colts...PJ is a baller from the XFL...who knows what it takes to fight to get where you are...

 

So as a Panthers fan 🙏 for 6

 

PJ and Fields aren’t really comparable. I believe PJs pro day 40 is closer to Darnold than it is to Fields. Fields faced more pressure than any other QB this preseason on his drop backs (49% of his drop backs were under pressure) and he didn’t shrink to a miserable 41% completions. 

 

 It’s not against PJ only. The year before it was against Grier. When you play like trash you should be cut or the position should be upgraded. If Sam goes down, our season is over. 

Pray for 14 to stay healthy and develop. We need to upgrade at backup QB. Grier would be minimally better than PJ anyway. Neither one of them are winning us games. They can only hope to not be the cause we lose,  it they won’t ever be why we win. 

Panther fans don’t root and hope for the starter to go down just so the backup can get reps and prove he’s not starting material. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

PJ and Fields aren’t really comparable. I believe PJs pro day 40 is closer to Darnold than it is to Fields. Fields faced more pressure than any other QB this preseason on his drop backs (49% of his drop backs were under pressure) and he didn’t shrink to a miserable 41% completions. 

 

 It’s not against PJ only. The year before it was against Grier. When you play like trash you should be cut or the position should be upgraded. If Sam goes down, our season is over. 

Pray for 14 to stay healthy and develop. We need to upgrade at backup QB. Grier would be minimally better than PJ anyway. Neither one of them are winning us games. They can only hope to not be the cause we lose,  it they won’t ever be why we win. 

Panther fans don’t root and hope for the starter to go down just so the backup can get reps and prove he’s not starting material. 

Except during the Clausen season.  You might even have to include the Weinke season as well.

Your premise is theoretically correct but there are always outliers. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Gotta believe the chances of PJ getting picked up off waivers would have been less than Will's.

If Rhule hoped to keep both backup QBs, his bias for his former college players may have betrayed him this time.

If true he will learn soon enough.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Gotta believe the chances of PJ getting picked up off waivers would have been less than Will's.

If Rhule hoped to keep both backup QBs, his bias for his former college players may have betrayed him this time.

Will got a 2% chance.  PJ got a 1% chance.  Whatever it actually is, I almost think any conversation that involves  PJ/Grier is splitting hairs.   

What we needed to of done is not go all in on Sam Darnold.   Darnold is the underlying reason everyone is so passionate about this pointless debate.    If we were going this route, we should of brought in two guys IMO.  So you bring in Darnold and Mitch T.  Or Darnold and Menshew.   Let them compete.  Increase your odds. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Will got a 2% chance.  PJ got a 1% chance.  Whatever it actually is, I almost think any conversation that involves  PJ/Grier is splitting hairs.   

What we needed to of done is not go all in on Sam Darnold.   Darnold is the underlying reason everyone is so passionate about this pointless debate.    If we were going this route, we should of brought in two guys IMO.  So you bring in Darnold and Mitch T.  Or Darnold and Menshew.   Let them compete.  Increase your odds. 

Hence....THE QB CONTROVERSY of 2021....we are now left with no choice but PJ

 

...you kno, in case, Sam Darnold doesn't pan out

 

giphy (4).gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Will got a 2% chance.  PJ got a 1% chance.  Whatever it actually is, I almost think any conversation that involves  PJ/Grier is splitting hairs.   

What we needed to of done is not go all in on Sam Darnold.   Darnold is the underlying reason everyone is so passionate about this pointless debate.    If we were going this route, we should of brought in two guys IMO.  So you bring in Darnold and Mitch T.  Or Darnold and Menshew.   Let them compete.  Increase your odds. 

Yeah, seeing how little Darnold and Menshew cost to pickup by their respective teams, there is a good argument to be made for creating a more competitive situation in Carolina.

Though isn't that what Denver has been attempting to do for years now?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, the Panthers powers that be seem desperate to convince themselves he can clear the bare minimum bar of demanding a legit franchise QB contract. Canales seems to be laying the groundwork here of building the case that all of Bryce's shortcomings are still there and even more glaring than you may have thought while his strengths aren't nearly as strong as you had hoped and aren't near enough to make up for the lack of pure physical tools. When you have historically anomalous lack of measurables you need historically anomalous positive intangibles to make up for it. That was always issue with Bryce as a prospect. Like Parcells said when evaluating him, "he better walk on water". 
    • I'm honestly not sure how much "west coast" plays into it. There's a huge difference between Tucson, AZ and Spokane, WA where he spent the previous two decades of his career. Chapel Hill is significantly different than Spokane but way more similar to it than Tucson. You're talking about a pretty significant plane ride to get back home either way. He and his family would be flying private and direct so we're talking about a 3ish hour flight vs. a 5ish hour flight. That's basically a wash. It's not like he went from Gonzaga to another PNW program. Tucson is a dramatic departure from Washington state. Honestly a far bigger departure climatically and scenery wise than Chapel Hill would be.
    • When asked if he thought he was close to returning to game action, "When you skate just with the goalie coach, it's tough to understand what your level is. Today, Svech scored on me a couple — probably a bad moment for me. I don't know. I'm probably very far from play if he scores on me." God, I love Kucci!
×
×
  • Create New...