Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WSOC is showing the Colts game again


GRWatcher
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SBBlue said:

Between the green screen, blocky dial-up modemish freezes, and the international soccer, I about lost it. I switched to watch on Panthers.com.

 

Yeah, I was absolutely livid!! When their feed finally “fixed”, it definitely wasn’t HD quality, it was like they were using a camcorder from the 80’s…

Season 6 Episode 3 GIF by ABC Network

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weyco2000 said:

Yeah, I was absolutely livid!! When their feed finally “fixed”, it definitely wasn’t HD quality, it was like they were using a camcorder from the 80’s…

Season 6 Episode 3 GIF by ABC Network

LOL
I know it's 2021 and clear skies and they can't figure out how to broadcast an away game.   My dvr didn't even show it on the WSOC schedule.  It got taped under the soccer and WNBA titles.
 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

LOL
I know it's 2021 and clear skies and they can't figure out how to broadcast an away game.   My dvr didn't even show it on the WSOC schedule.  It got taped under the soccer and WNBA titles.
 

Yeah total failure by WSOC. I have YouTube TV and it was listed as soccer also. It was like they forgot they were broadcasting the game, really odd.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weyco2000 said:

Yeah total failure by WSOC. I have YouTube TV and it was listed as soccer also. It was like they forgot they were broadcasting the game, really odd.

If you go to your live feed on YouTube TV and find TV64 (down just a little from the top of the listing), 7pm today (8/17), it is listed as Panthers v Colts so DVRing it shouldn't be any problem.

I missed most of the 2nd qtr and ended up using the Panthers app on my phone but with my bad eyes had trouble seeing any details such as jersey numbers. So I will watch it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, weyco2000 said:

Yeah total failure by WSOC. I have YouTube TV and it was listed as soccer also. It was like they forgot they were broadcasting the game, really odd.

As mentioned in a different thread, various TV providers rely on data from three(?) different guide services. Comcast may use service #1, Spectrum may use service #2, YouTube may use service #3.

Those guides are only as good as the data fed to them (obviously). In some instances, it's the responsibility of the individual TV station to upload data to each of the individual providers; in other cases, some providers use feeds from each other to populate data (meaning, they rely on a "partner" to be the sole/best source of info). In other cases, the guides publish data they receive from the network, and they may have had some issue with a local station's "override national programming" update -- for discussion purposes, a bad update could be a funky non-ASCII character from a copy/paste, or perhaps a title or description that was too long, resulting in an inaccessible/invalid data entry until it's fixed.

In all cases, it can take a day or more for updates to be populated into the DB and pushed out to receivers or other user-facing interfaces. It's definitely not instant upon update by any means, even for online-only services.

In an ideal world, these updates would be in real-time, so your DVR would know automatically to continue to record overtime games as they ran over. But for now, we're kinda stuck having to manually say "let's add an extra hour to the recording, just in case"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the exception of knowing our obvious needs and who we were talking to along the way, my question is this:  How did so many people start on this Jalon Walker frenzy?  I think this--everyone wants to have a voice, make a prediction.  Now with social media and 24 hour tv, networks, etc.  it is more like a middle school grapevine than it is a process where people actually dig for real evidence and reasons.  Speculative journalism is lazy, and since there are now 2,348.356 podcasters with basement studios blasting nonsense into our phones all day, I think they just cut and paste ideas.  Yes, coaches lie and mislead, but I don't think Morgan or Canales did.  You are only as reliable as your sources.  Was Morgan more deliberate this year?  I think he heard the gossip and decided to downplay WR.  He said, (paraphrasing) "We like our QB room.  We will probably add to it at some point."  Not a lie, but definitely downplaying things. I was convinced that we needed a blazer to keep safeties honest, but to be honest, I am not sure that we have the QB with the arm to keep safeties honest.  We have Coker who is 6'1", Theilen is 6'2", and Legette is 6'3" and now TMac is 6'4"+.  It seems size has more value than blazing deep speed.  If I had known they thought that, I might have gone with TMac all along--I thought he was not a good fit.  And if you look at the Panther guide and consider the talent they met with in the first round, there was only one offensive player--TMac. There was another quote that Morgan made that might have been a bit revealing or at least directive. (Paraphrasing) "We want players that were productive in college."  Well, TMac was very productive. In 2023 and in 2024, he averaged 108.8 yards per game.   He is also a great artist.  Drew this portrait of Bryce Young from memory: Many people spent 3 months absolutely confident that Jalon Walker would play edge here. We had a need at edge, but with Clowney, Wonnum, and Jones, were we OK if we drafted a second round Edge? Was Walker the answer?  Unlike Hunter, he is a versatile player who could be awesome in the right system, but if used as a pure edge, he is not a top 10 player.  I was convinced that we would sign Jalon and as much as I like the kid, I could not feel good about the pick.  Mykel Williams scared me.  Both might be great players, but I could not see it.  So was Scourton productive? He was as a Jr when he was standing.  When asked to be other things, he lost his edge (pun intended). In essence, I think we got the best pure edge when you take away the other things he was supposed to do.  Walker's productivity was based on his versatility--something he would lose as a pure edge--so we would not really be meeting needs at edge.  Scourton, on the other hand, is better when not asked to be versatile.  Princely had 10.5 sacks in the SEC.  It simply makes sense.
    • I think they will too. Renfrow will use this opportunity to get in shape and get paid for it. After he's cut he will probably get picked up by someone after preseason.
×
×
  • Create New...