Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule's QBs troughout his coaching career


JABANOG
 Share

Recommended Posts

Temple

13-16 PJ Walker

Baylor

17 Zach Smith/ Charlie Brewer 

18-19 Charlie Brewer 

Panthers

20 Teddy/PJ/Will

21 Darnold/PJ/Will

 

Yea this man shouldn't be making the QB decisions even with full roster control it seems he's never even had an AVERAGE QB 

  • Beer 2
  • Poo 22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JABANOG said:

Temple

13-16 PJ Walker

Baylor

17 Zach Smith/ Charlie Brewer 

18-19 Charlie Brewer 

Panthers

20 Teddy/PJ/Will

21 Darnold/PJ/Will

 

Yea this man shouldn't be making the QB decisions even with full roster control it seems he's never even had an AVERAGE QB 

We PASSED on Fields for a corner, albeit a corner that's likely to be damn good, but we passed on Fields and talked ourselves into a QB saying things like ''well if Darnold came out this year he'd be behind Trevor Lawrence''. 

BUT, he didn't come out this year, he came out 3 years ago....sigh*

I don't HATE the Darnold move, I'd rather they both be on the roster with not 18.8M guaranteed to Darnold in 2022. I hope it all works out. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

so you’re saying he’s built successful, winning programs without a top QB? imagine what he could do if he had one…

successful winning programs but only one bowl game victory and 3 double digit winning seasons out of 7 

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SetfreexX said:

We PASSED on Fields for a corner, albeit a corner that's likely to be damn good, but we passed on Fields and talked ourselves into a QB saying things like ''well if Darnold came out this year he'd be behind Trevor Lawrence''. 

BUT, he didn't come out this year, he came out 3 years ago....sigh*

I don't HATE the Darnold move, I'd rather they both be on the roster with not 18.8M guaranteed to Darnold in 2022. I hope it all works out. 

its simple he's never had a dynamic QB thinks he can win w/o one oh boy is he in for a shock in this TALENT driven league 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SetfreexX said:

We PASSED on Fields for a corner, albeit a corner that's likely to be damn good, but we passed on Fields and talked ourselves into a QB saying things like ''well if Darnold came out this year he'd be behind Trevor Lawrence''. 

BUT, he didn't come out this year, he came out 3 years ago....sigh*

I don't HATE the Darnold move, I'd rather they both be on the roster with not 18.8M guaranteed to Darnold in 2022. I hope it all works out. 

We dont know what Fields is, he did not look great against the bills backups. He could be a massive bust. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

so you’re saying he’s built successful, winning programs without a top QB? imagine what he could do if he had one…

That's the point, he seems to never be able to get one. I don't think anyone is questioning the coaching, just the fact QB has been a pain point. 

Similar to how we struggled to draft receivers for YEARS. Whether it was Hurney or Gettleman we could not bridge the gap from Smith to the next, we were fortunate with Curtis back in 17' then landing Moore in 18' that was a 4 and 5 year stretch post Smith's release. 

KB, injured and out of shape, Funchess never lived up to his potential even when he was made the #1 in 2018. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no point in going back to Temple and Baylor to judge this. As of now he is tied to Bridgewater and Darnold and going 0 for 2 isn't an option. The man needs a hit. The fact such a basic discussion triggers some is a reflection of how long mediocrity has settled in with this fanbase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...