Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for you 50 years plus folk (and others)?


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

It's better than the just plain sucking that we have done in the past 27 seasons.

If you think we've sucked for 27 years, then you haven't been paying attention. I rank 1996 right up there with 2003 & 2015 because there is no other feeling like being a team for only 2 years and making it to the NFC championship game. None. For me, even going to the Super Bowls doesn't match it.

No, I wouldn't make that deal. Not counting Rhule, we have had 4 coaches in those 27 years and, despite Richardson,  3 took us to the playoffs, 2 took us to Super Bowls. Pretty good odds and I'll gladly make those journeys again to see us win the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GRWatcher said:

If you think we've sucked for 27 years, then you haven't been paying attention. I rank 1996 right up there with 2003 & 2015 because there is no other feeling like being a team for only 2 years and making it to the NFC championship game. None. For me, even going to the Super Bowls doesn't match it.

No, I wouldn't make that deal. Not counting Rhule, we have had 4 coaches in those 27 years and, despite Richardson,  3 took us to the playoffs, 2 took us to Super Bowls. Pretty good odds and I'll gladly make those journeys again to see us win the Super Bowl.

You know have only had 7 winning seasons, right?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GRWatcher said:

Stop with the hysterical hyperbole abut our history. If you choose to continually look at the negatives that is your choice. But your over-the-top constant complaining is getting tiresome.

Aaaah. I see, you are just overly emotional. 

Nevermind. Carry on with your crying.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He has attempted 8 shootout goals in his NHL career and made 1. He is among our worst SO guys on the entire roster in terms of career stats.
    • Against Miami, the Panthers were behind by 17 in the 2nd quarter facing a 4th - 5. Young completed a 21 yard pass and they went on to score 7 on that drive. Then in the 4th, down by 4, they faced a 4th - 5 and again, he completed a 17 yard pass and they went onto score a TD for the win. He also accounted for 2 of the 3 TD's.  As I said, he got them in that mess and no doubt, Rico gets credit as well, but missing on either of those 4th down conversions hands the ball over and results in 1 or 2 less TD's giving them a loss. As you said though, that's just a small quibble. The real question is how does the FO see it?  I am guessing they see it as something to build on. I think most peope here see it as a total loss and fully expect the FO to see it that way as well. Time will tell.  
    • Kochetkov is just too streaky. TBD if Freddie is doing that too. Freddie is the more reliable goalie over his career. The Bussi kid looks like he could be a solid #2 eventually.  Just need to figure out the #1 guy. Same as almost every year. It's not talent, it's consistency and being able to step up in the playoffs.
×
×
  • Create New...