Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers lead at the half against Cowboys/Officials


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Refs are poo.

I also don’t believe Cowboys are overrated. They are actually good and we are just becoming a contending team in front of everyone’s eyes. Look at all the injuries and we still look great on D overall. We have one of the best coaching staffs in the league and it’s becoming clear to the mainstream. 
 

Win or not today, we are a team who can complete with the “playoff teams”

Edited by WarPanthers89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Carolina Passing
C/ATT    YDS    AVG    TD    INT    SACKS    RTG
Sam Darnold    12/16    114    7.1    0    0    3-21    94.3
TEAM    12/16    93    7.1    0    0    3-21    94.3
 Dallas Passing
C/ATT    YDS    AVG    TD    INT    SACKS    RTG
Dak Prescott    8/15    103    6.9    1    0    0-0    97.4
TEAM    8/15    103    6.9    1    0    0-0    97.4
 

Got to reverse those sack numbers in the 2nd half.

 

Officiating horrible!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matchup car.png&h=100&w=100 dal.png&h=100&w=100
1st Downs 12 12
Passing 1st downs 5 6
Rushing 1st downs 7 5
1st downs from penalties 0 1
3rd down efficiency 4-6 2-6
4th down efficiency 0-0 1-1
Total Plays 33 31
Total Yards 166 204
Total Drives 5 5
Yards per Play 5.0 6.6
Passing 93 103
Comp-Att 12-16 8-15
Yards per pass 4.9 6.9
Interceptions thrown 0 0
Sacks-Yards Lost 3-21 0-0
Rushing 73 101
Rushing Attempts 14 16
Yards per rush 5.2 6.3
Red Zone (Made-Att) 2-2 2-2
Penalties 3-12 3-20
Turnovers 0 0
Fumbles lost 0 0
Interceptions thrown 0 0
Defensive / Special Teams TDs 0 0
Possession 16:51 13:09

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That "forward progression" play was one of the WORSE calls I've ever seen. How is a bang bang tackle INSTANTLY called dead? So you're telling me they literally called that play dead in a millisecond, because that's how fast that play happened. Screwed us out of a fumble and should be up 14-7 right now.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...