Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm sorry but this isn't a winning record team.


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Fug Drump said:

What is a pressing situation to a "good team"??  Yall feel that the Panthers are a good team, correct???  Or were they over-inflated with a 3-0 record due to playing against three bad teams???  If you are a good team, then those weren't pressing situations.

Any time you have a  fumble that was not called that would have given the Panthers great field position but let Dallas retain position and drive for a score was bad. Add on the obivious one side penalities called against the Panthers and the no calls against Dallas, putting the Panthers in situations that would be called pressing were hard for the Panthers ( or other good teams)  to overcome. To disallow that this had a negative effect on the games outcome would be foolish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Make the playoffs? Don't know. A lot of factors that we don't control go into that.

Winning record though? Yeah that's very possible.

It's also very possible that we end up sub. 500. Yes we can look past this loss and we play less competition but that's not given. Dallas wasn't a fluke game more a game that exposed our weaknesses. Something the coaching staff couldn't overcome. I think beating up on lesser competition made us look like a legitimate team. I think we are a rebuilding team. Time will tell who's the "dumb" one in this. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Honestly, he should've hoped that we win, but suspected that we lose. That was a tough order with Horn and CMC out (and still not overwhelmingly promising with them in).

It was a winnable game until we got out coached. Plenty of blame why they couldn't have adjusted but we were winning at half time. I'm not overy upset we are not a winning team year two. We have came a long way. We will progress and have our time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

unfortunately, Scots contribution to this board has devolved to calling other people’s posts dumb.

Yup and mine isn't that out worldly. We seriously had someone state we are a legendary Defense before we got cleaned up. There has been some quiet outrageous predictions and I'm shocked us being 8-9 is the most disliked. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We only have to win 9 games to have a winning record, we are 1/3rd of the way there through 4 games. 

We have games against eagles, vikings, giants, falcons x2, miami, pats, and WFT

We have the saints in NO which could be a tougher game than the first one.

Tougher games are Cards, Bills, Bucs x2

So out of 9 games that we should win we only have to win 6 of them to have a winning record. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

We only have to win 9 games to have a winning record, we are 1/3rd of the way there through 4 games. 

We have games against eagles, vikings, giants, falcons x2, miami, pats, and WFT

We have the saints in NO which could be a tougher game than the first one.

Tougher games are Cards, Bills, Bucs x2

So out of 9 games that we should win we only have to win 6 of them to have a winning record. 

 

So you think the Eagles and Pats are pushovers? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...