Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm sorry but this isn't a winning record team.


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Fug Drump said:

What is a pressing situation to a "good team"??  Yall feel that the Panthers are a good team, correct???  Or were they over-inflated with a 3-0 record due to playing against three bad teams???  If you are a good team, then those weren't pressing situations.

Any time you have a  fumble that was not called that would have given the Panthers great field position but let Dallas retain position and drive for a score was bad. Add on the obivious one side penalities called against the Panthers and the no calls against Dallas, putting the Panthers in situations that would be called pressing were hard for the Panthers ( or other good teams)  to overcome. To disallow that this had a negative effect on the games outcome would be foolish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Make the playoffs? Don't know. A lot of factors that we don't control go into that.

Winning record though? Yeah that's very possible.

It's also very possible that we end up sub. 500. Yes we can look past this loss and we play less competition but that's not given. Dallas wasn't a fluke game more a game that exposed our weaknesses. Something the coaching staff couldn't overcome. I think beating up on lesser competition made us look like a legitimate team. I think we are a rebuilding team. Time will tell who's the "dumb" one in this. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Honestly, he should've hoped that we win, but suspected that we lose. That was a tough order with Horn and CMC out (and still not overwhelmingly promising with them in).

It was a winnable game until we got out coached. Plenty of blame why they couldn't have adjusted but we were winning at half time. I'm not overy upset we are not a winning team year two. We have came a long way. We will progress and have our time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

unfortunately, Scots contribution to this board has devolved to calling other people’s posts dumb.

Yup and mine isn't that out worldly. We seriously had someone state we are a legendary Defense before we got cleaned up. There has been some quiet outrageous predictions and I'm shocked us being 8-9 is the most disliked. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We only have to win 9 games to have a winning record, we are 1/3rd of the way there through 4 games. 

We have games against eagles, vikings, giants, falcons x2, miami, pats, and WFT

We have the saints in NO which could be a tougher game than the first one.

Tougher games are Cards, Bills, Bucs x2

So out of 9 games that we should win we only have to win 6 of them to have a winning record. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

We only have to win 9 games to have a winning record, we are 1/3rd of the way there through 4 games. 

We have games against eagles, vikings, giants, falcons x2, miami, pats, and WFT

We have the saints in NO which could be a tougher game than the first one.

Tougher games are Cards, Bills, Bucs x2

So out of 9 games that we should win we only have to win 6 of them to have a winning record. 

 

So you think the Eagles and Pats are pushovers? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not exactly sure that is an honest assesment of the talent he had to work with that year. Olsen had over 1100 yards that season making the PB, Stewart had close to 1100 total yards also going to the PB. He had Kalil at C who went to the PB, Trai Turner at RG who also went to the PB, and Michael Oher at LT who played well enough that the Panthers offered him a new contract the following year. I wouldn't call that a trash OL. He also played with a defense that was stacked with talent as well.   "The thing we are doing better this time around is actually surrounding our #1 overall draft pick QB with talent vs. asking him to completely carry the offense. I just hope that effort is leading us to realize that the guy isn't even good enough to get carried." Please.... Did you not read the list of names Newton had to work with his rookie season. I guess you missed it so I will post it again for you... Steve Smith (PB), Greg Olsen (PB), Brandon LaFell, Ted Ginn JR, Deangelo Williams (PB), Jonathan Stewart (PB), Jordan Grossn (PB), Ryan Kalil (PB) on the offensive side and then he had Luke Kuechly (PB), Jon Beason (PB), Thomas Davis (PB), Star Lotulelei, Kawann Short ( PB ),Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy (PB ), Mike Mitchell, Josh Norman (PB)  For comparison, here is who Young had his first year.  Chuba Hubbard, DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Adam Thielen, Hayden Hurst, Ikem Ekwonu, Chandler Zavala, Bradley Bozeman, Nash Jensen and Taylor Morton. Not a single PB player on the list and most of them aren't even playing any longer. Additionally, his HC was fired during the season and the defense was as bad as the offense.  You might not like the comparison but saying Newton had to completely carry the offense isn't exactly fair to the 4 pro bowlers on offense who played with him that year.
    • That's why I say we have to keep looking. Even if you believe Bryce is the guy, KP and Grier are not and who knows if King is anything more than a gimmick player, we should be active in improving our 2nd QB spot. Season ending injuries happen, and you don't just want to roll over and give it up. How many starters have we seen come from the ranks of backup? Having 2 potential starting QBs is one of the best problems we could have. 
    • Eh, it’s more on how bad the refs are. Some of these calls against the canes are no calls 
×
×
  • Create New...