I'm sorry but this isn't a winning record team.

[Mother Grabber]

11 minutes ago, Snake said:

How is gaining more wins than last year a "dumb" opinion? So do you want to go on record and say this team will make the playoffs? Yeah I think not... 

unfortunately, Scots contribution to this board has devolved to calling other people’s posts dumb.

[KatsAzz]

10 hours ago, Fug Drump said:

What is a pressing situation to a "good team"??  Yall feel that the Panthers are a good team, correct???  Or were they over-inflated with a 3-0 record due to playing against three bad teams???  If you are a good team, then those weren't pressing situations.

Any time you have a  fumble that was not called that would have given the Panthers great field position but let Dallas retain position and drive for a score was bad. Add on the obivious one side penalities called against the Panthers and the no calls against Dallas, putting the Panthers in situations that would be called pressing were hard for the Panthers ( or other good teams)  to overcome. To disallow that this had a negative effect on the games outcome would be foolish.

[Snake]

33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Make the playoffs? Don't know. A lot of factors that we don't control go into that.

Winning record though? Yeah that's very possible.

It's also very possible that we end up sub. 500. Yes we can look past this loss and we play less competition but that's not given. Dallas wasn't a fluke game more a game that exposed our weaknesses. Something the coaching staff couldn't overcome. I think beating up on lesser competition made us look like a legitimate team. I think we are a rebuilding team. Time will tell who's the "dumb" one in this. 

[KatsAzz]

33 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

unfortunately, Scots contribution to this board has devolved to calling other people’s posts dumb.

However, it seems his opinion on this subjuct is shared by most of us.

[Snake]

46 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Honestly, he should've hoped that we win, but suspected that we lose. That was a tough order with Horn and CMC out (and still not overwhelmingly promising with them in).

It was a winnable game until we got out coached. Plenty of blame why they couldn't have adjusted but we were winning at half time. I'm not overy upset we are not a winning team year two. We have came a long way. We will progress and have our time. 

[Snake]

39 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

unfortunately, Scots contribution to this board has devolved to calling other people’s posts dumb.

Yup and mine isn't that out worldly. We seriously had someone state we are a legendary Defense before we got cleaned up. There has been some quiet outrageous predictions and I'm shocked us being 8-9 is the most disliked. 

[Mr. Scot]

43 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

unfortunately, Scots contribution to this board has devolved to calling other people’s posts dumb.

Eeehhh, only when it's deserved.

This is one of those times.

[Snake]

8 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

However, it seems his opinion on this subjuct is shared by most of us.

Your opinion on most subjects end in so I guess I'm ahead of the game. 

[Snake]

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Eeehhh, only when it's deserved.

This is one of those times.

So are you on record that we will be better than. 500 this season. Can we go ahead and do that? 

[rayzor]

1 hour ago, Snake said:

That's because everyone deep down knows I'm right.

Suuuuuurre......

[Snake]

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Suuuuuurre......

[PootieNunu]

We only have to win 9 games to have a winning record, we are 1/3rd of the way there through 4 games. 

We have games against eagles, vikings, giants, falcons x2, miami, pats, and WFT

We have the saints in NO which could be a tougher game than the first one.

Tougher games are Cards, Bills, Bucs x2

So out of 9 games that we should win we only have to win 6 of them to have a winning record. 

 

[Snake]

30 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

We only have to win 9 games to have a winning record, we are 1/3rd of the way there through 4 games. 

We have games against eagles, vikings, giants, falcons x2, miami, pats, and WFT

We have the saints in NO which could be a tougher game than the first one.

Tougher games are Cards, Bills, Bucs x2

So out of 9 games that we should win we only have to win 6 of them to have a winning record. 

 

So you think the Eagles and Pats are pushovers? 

[PootieNunu]

14 minutes ago, Snake said:

So you think the Eagles and Pats are pushovers? 

Not pushovers, but games we should win. Do you think we are pushovers?