Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam old Sam ...


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you are thinking that Bridgewater is in anyway the answer then you are completely missing the point. 

A lower ceiling is a lower ceiling and when there is as much tape on both as there was before coming here, it is not at all surprising. Why can't we see reality and set these guys up for where they can perform at their ceilings? That's the concerning part. This is the NFL, great teams make do with less and dumb teams play pretend. Hopefully Rhule and Fritts wakes up and changes their evaluation and support processes going forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Bridgewater wouldn't have thrown as many picks because he didn't have the balls to try risky throws.

Throwing two yard passes when you need six or seven yards may not turn the ball over, but it doesn't exactly win games either.

I get what you're saying. But, I didn't see Sam make any really risky throws yesterday. He didn't make any throws "yesterday" that Teddy couldn't have made.  I just several really bad one throws and missed chances. Those INT's were off target/behind the receiver. He also missed some down the field opportunities. 

I only made my point because we wouldn't have had to give up a 2nd choice if we had kept Teddy, thus giving us more draft capital going forward. That said, I never have thought Teddy B was a franchise QB.

Edited by SCO96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCO96 said:

I get what you're saying. But, I didn't see Sam make any really risky throws yesterday. He didn't make any throws "yesterday" that Teddy couldn't have made.  I just several really bad one throws and missed chances. Those INT's were off target/behind the receiver. He also missed some down the field opportunities. 

I only made my point because we wouldn't have had to give up a 2nd choice if we had kept Teddy, thus giving us more draft capital going forward. That said, I never have thought Teddy B was a franchise QB.

I'll take a quarterback who takes risks over one who plays it safe tem times out of ten, even in a WCO.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

I get what you're saying. But, I didn't see Sam make any really risky throws yesterday. He didn't make any throws "yesterday" that Teddy couldn't have made.  I just several really bad one throws and missed chances. Those INT's were off target/behind the receiver. He also missed some down the field opportunities. 

I only made my point because we wouldn't have had to give up a 2nd choice if we had kept Teddy, thus giving us more draft capital going forward. That said, I never have thought Teddy B was a franchise QB.

A dominant defensive performance where all you need to do is manage turnovers and get your team in scoring position and keep the other team playing the long field is exactly the type of game Teddy wins you. 

You don't have those games every week and when Teddy needed to do more he failed which is why we moved on, but I don't understand the need for folks to stubbornly deny a fairly mild take. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pantherxtreme said:

And I'll take a QB that protects the ball when I have a defense that's playing great and I'll beat your risk taker 9 out of 10 times. 

How'd that work out last season?

What Bridgewater does isn't "protecting the ball". I could get behind that.

Playing scared? Not so much.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ꧁༺✨❗Shop Now ❗✨༻꧂ https://worksupplement.com/revivie-cbd-gummies-buy ꧁༺✨❗Facebook Now❗✨༻꧂ https://www.facebook.com/RevivCBDGummiesUS/ ➥✅ Official Website:Reviv CBD Gummies ➥✅ Product Name:Reviv CBD Gummies ➥✅ Rating: ★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) ➥✅ Side Effects: No Major Side Effects ➥✅ Availability: In Stock #1 Product in the USA   In recent years, CBD products have surged in popularity, offering a natural alternative for individuals seeking relief from various ailments. Among these products, CBD gummies have emerged as a convenient and enjoyable way to incorporate cannabidiol (CBD) into one's wellness routine. Among the multitude of options available, Reviv CBD Gummies have garnered attention for their purported benefits and quality. In this article, we delve into the world of Reviv CBD Gummies to explore their potential advantages and why they have become a preferred choice for many consumers.   FOR MORE INFO CLICK HERE :👇👇 https://www.facebook.com/RevivCBDGummiesUS/ https://sites.google.com/view/reviv-cbd-gummies-us/home https://sites.google.com/view/revivcbdgummies/home https://medium.com/@jackeever/reviv-cbd-gummies-updated-negative-side-effects-risk-or-legit-gummies-to-try-59595cc00c63 https://medium.com/@jackeever/reviv-cbd-gummies-reviews-cost-updated-better-than-other-cbd-gummies-in-2024-79a9b6672abe https://reviv-cbd-gummies-1.jimdosite.com/ https://reviv-cbd-gummies-us.jimdosite.com/ https://reviv-cbd-gummies.company.site/ https://reviv-cbd-gummies-us.webflow.io/ https://jacke-ever.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/04/25/reviv-cbd-gummies-new-report-does-it-work-what-they-wont-tell-you-before-buying https://www.eventbrite.com/e/reviv-cbd-gummies-hidden-truth-exposed-update-2024-you-must-see-this-tickets-894978844817?aff=oddtdtcreator https://www.eventbrite.com/e/reviv-cbd-gummies-reviews-fraud-or-legit-2024-beware-scam-warning-exposed-tickets-894981091537?aff=oddtdtcreator https://www.townscript.com/e/reviv-cbd-gummies-reviews-beware-fraud-consumer-claims-and-results-103010 https://revivcbdgummies.blogspot.com/2024/04/reviv-cbd-gummies.html   FACEBOOK@:- https://www.facebook.com/Get.ReviveCBDGummiesReviews/ https://www.facebook.com/PuraviveZA/
    • I always just go back to what I said at the time. Trade Burns to the Rams because it's a fantastic deal. I was screaming it. I'm still angry at Fitt over that. Right after he turned down the deal I said he needed to get into a time machine and go back and make the deal. Hate that dude. Ruined our team. Trading D.J was a major mistake because what matters most in the NFL is the passing game, so you never unload a proven #1 WR when there are other options. Always trade a defensive player over a WR if you have that option available. Fitt was precious about defensive players when we had a passing offense that didn't function. That's how know he was completely incompetent. The passing offense is the top priority, so until that is functioning all defensive players are possible trade fodder. At this point we're in a rebuilding year under a new GM and a QB who looks absolutely horrendous. It makes perfect sense, if you follow all of our moves, that we would be the worst team in the NFL. Of course we are. You can't screw up as a GM that many times over the years and not ruin the franchise. We're exactly where we should be, dead last, or bottom 3. Whichever you like. But this is the here and now. Dan did a good job getting our 2nd round pick back, and we won't know about the picks until they take the field in regular season games. We're in dark until then, but if they suck the Panthers media will hide it shamelessly. Remember when Young was supposed to be a football genius? Yeah he was rancid turds out there when live fire started. There is some hope. Either Young improves and we win more games, or he stays about the same and we draft a new QB in 2025. Either way the NFL will help us out of this jam, but all we need is for Dan not to screw it up. 
×
×
  • Create New...