Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Very Discouraged By Rhule and His Comments After the Game


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

All he said was if we have the lead in the 4thQ the defense should hold the lead.

"I really think you know you guys have asked me a lot about the third quarter i can promise you I think about it just as much as you guys do too you know it's like it's driving me nuts....we've got to
play better in the second half"

Penalties, bad throws, interceptions, dropped balls, a blocked punt killed us in the second half.  Those aren't scheme related.   Rhule didn't scheme the blocked punt.  Now the protection issues were exacerbated scheme and that I put on Brady.

To argue that we should have run the ball less ignores what was happening in the game, because we could move the ball running it.

You could argue at the end of the first half he should have gone for a first or gone for the field goal on 4th down, but had it failed it would have made it even easier for Phily to get 3 points, which they proceeded to do.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Yeah, but you don't know what his idea of "4 quarters of football" is, because he also immediately defended the offense after the game on Sunday and said we moved the ball well and scored a FG in the second half.  That tells me his mindset isn't to go down and score a TD every time we possess the ball in the 2nd half.  There is a clear shift in mentality from the first and second half, offensively and it is because he relies heavily on the defense.

Notice how different the offense looked when Dallas went up 22 points?  Yeah.  I wouldn't read too much into what he says to the media.

Well hopefully he won't put the interceptions, penalties and blocked punts in the playbook for the second half this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

"I really think you know you guys have asked me a lot about the third quarter i can promise you I think about it just as much as you guys do too you know it's like it's driving me nuts....we've got to
play better in the second half"

Penalties, bad throws, interceptions, dropped balls, a blocked punt killed us in the second half.  Those aren't scheme related.   Rhule didn't scheme the blocked punt.  Now the protection issues were exacerbated scheme and that I put on Brady.

To argue that we should have run the ball less ignores what was happening in the game, because we could move the ball running it.

You could argue at the end of the first half he should have gone for a first or gone for the field goal on 4th down, but had it failed it would have made it even easier for Phily to get 3 points, which they proceeded to do.

 

Great points, but again, it goes back to philosophy.  We've seen these type of teams before under Fox and Rivera...  and that first half decision was a prime example - as you said, if we failed to convert, it would have made it easier to score their 3 points.  Well, if they were going to score it anyway, why not go for it?  What did we have to lose?  And my main issue at this point is Charlton is not a weapon.  Even if I want to play it conservatively, he doesn't help me because his punting is atrocious.  He isn't giving us an advantage in field position, so just go for it...  we'd only have been spotting them 20 yards at that point.  Same with the Fake FG Punt.  It reeked of conservative, "I'm gonna rely on my defense to win it" mentality.  He says he was to figure out the issues, but does stuff like that, and that is what really bothers me.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/10/2021 at 6:03 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I think I saw the coaching staff's confidence in Darnold crack today and the back breaking final INT might just reinforce that. We really took the ball out of his hands when we were desperately trying to hang on before the Eagles took the lead.

IMHO Against the number 31 defense against the run, they should have taken it out a lot sooner 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I have felt like there is an element of this going back a few weeks.  But, even before the rash of injuries, it seems if we have the lead at the half, Rhule feels thats enough of one that we should sit on it and rely on the defense to shut down the opposing offense to preserve the win.  This is also why I think he's conservative about making any adjustments for the second half as well, because if we execute what he plans, we can just chew the clock. 

He has to expect and want more from his offense in the 2nd half.  If we have any semblance of a 3rd quarter the last two weeks, we are 5-0 right now.  It is a fatal flaw that has to be addressed.

So you're telling me that our oline's performance has had nothing to do with that? 

I have a difficult time blaming the HC, Brady,  or even Sam on the offensive failures. 

Until the interior of our oline is playing better, the rest is a moot point. 

Our starting tackles from the beginning of the hasn't been the issue. It's been the injuries and lack of execution on the interior of the oline. 

 I'm not making excuses Especially when the coaches themselves are saying that they need to coach better it's better, but but the online and specifically the interior of it is is it offensive issues you fix those and I promise you are offense will get greatly better better.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Until the interior of our oline is playing better, the rest is a moot point. 

I don't think this is going to happen though. The players we have started there aren't talented. Getting Eflein back and trying Brown are about the only way the interior is going to improve. It's not going to be Daley and Miller or Paradis. They are what they are.

Edited by Fox007
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

So you're telling me that our oline's performance has had nothing to do with that? 

I have a difficult time blaming the HC, Brady,  or even Sam on the offensive failures. 

Until the interior of our oline is playing better, the rest is a moot point. 

Our starting tackles from the beginning of the hasn't been the issue. It's been the injuries and lack of execution on the interior of the oline. 

 I'm not making excuses Especially when the coaches themselves are saying that they need to coach better it's better, but but the online and specifically the interior of it is is it offensive issues you fix those and I promise you are offense will get greatly better better.

It appears there's an echo on your end. But I'm with you on your analysis. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/10/2021 at 6:28 PM, Proudiddy said:

This overly optimistic, "there's always next year" approach from a large portion of our fanbase is what has us hovering around .500 as a franchise after 25+ years of existence.

I understand growing pains and such, but Rhule decided to stamp his brand on this franchise, and whiffed on one QB and is now not looking too hot on the other.  He (and Fitterer as well) also largely neglected the OL in the offseason despite the obvious need.  This defense is good enough to make a deep run in the playoffs if it had any inkling of complementary football from its offense and special teams units.  Yes, building a winning franchise takes time, but it doesn't have to take three years.  Sometimes it can take as little as one...  but our fanbase is so used to accepting mediocrity we make excuses for it.

To add to this, we're always one of the youngest teams because Rhule creates that built-in excuse, by bringing in young Temple players and jettisoning every veteran acquired before 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...