Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady Press Conference After the PHI Game


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

I agree that he should grow.

The only way he improves  is for him to see that he needs to improve.  Right now, he is putting it all on the players by saying it was execution.  There's no hope for growth if he can't see he needs to.

Watch this press conference in the OP and compare to Snow's after the Dallas game.  Snow owns it.  Brady is blaming the players.

 

Some people are much more eager to assign blame than I am. The Huddlez gets snippets of information from the team. Trying to put a puzzle together with too many missing pieces is impossible.

 

We know what they let us know. Behind closed doors, decisions are being made that we are not aware of. Trying to pigeon hole Brady with what little info we have is not fair.

 

All I/We really know is, Brady needs to improve. Can he? Will he? Who knows?

 

Let the process play out. Then react accordingly. Because, as of right now. Brady has been an OC for 21 games. Let the kid learn. After all, we are in a rebuild.

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Basbear said:

I think Sam gos into hero ball once the OL breaks down(which is HALF the time....). Issue is hero ball for Sam involves TOs and dumb decisions. Joke Brady needs to step it UP, run the ball when your backup RB is running well.....shotgun to aid OL.......put a TE in pass protection.....etc etc. Do your job and help the team win. Play Tmarshall more, jesus what do teams see in Brady??

I'd easily argue that he is having to rush his throws.  Plus the offense never found a rhythm at all this last Sunday.  Yet while there are a few that's not going to accept that but it's just the truth . I was in agony watching the game from the front row of the upper deck praying and praying that they would just find some rhythm on offense . If they could have done that they probably could have overcame the interior oline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Some people are much more eager to assign blame than I am. The Huddlez gets snippets of information from the team. Trying to put a puzzle together with too many missing pieces is impossible.

 

We know what they let us know. Behind closed doors, decisions are being made that we are not aware of. Trying to pigeon hole Brady with what little info we have is not fair.

 

All I/We really know is, Brady needs to improve. Can he? Will he? Who knows?

 

Let the process play out. Then react accordingly. Because, as of right now. Brady has been an OC for 21 games. Let the kid learn. After all, we are in a rebuild.

In the press conference Brady didn't own anything, and if you can't do it there, you're probably not doing it.  We'll see, but the pattern is forming.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

In the press conference Brady didn't own anything, and if you can't do it there, you're probably not doing it.  We'll see, but the pattern is forming.

 

Like I said. I'm not going there yet. There are enough folks piling on. You  all don't need me.

 

It's year 2 of a rebuild. I like the direction we are going. 

 

Edit to add. I am not saying I am happy with how the O is looking. What I am saying is, I trust the process.

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/15/2021 at 7:30 PM, pantherclaw said:

I'd easily argue that he is having to rush his throws.  Plus the offense never found a rhythm at all this last Sunday.  Yet while there are a few that's not going to accept that but it's just the truth . I was in agony watching the game from the front row of the upper deck praying and praying that they would just find some rhythm on offense . If they could have done that they probably could have overcame the interior oline.

I watch a few hours of Sam running around as a Jet.......3 of the games this year looked just the same. Its got to affect him....Joe can aid that and give help to a struggling OL. So many ways, roll sam out more, Shotgun(why sooo many under C snaps??? a few times Sam nearly got hit after 3 steps and a spin!), jumbo pass packages(giddy....), call plays that dont take 5secs to work, RUN THE GOD DAM BALL, replace Miller or daley with a traffic cone, play action after the run game is doing OK....etc etc. Stop focusing the DJMOORE pro-bowl express ala call more TE plays that they are the #1&2 reads...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...