Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think I'm ready for PJ

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

again, Cam’s days as the guy are done….

Conversation ain’t really about Cam.  But if Cam is better than what you got….that says something about your team. 

LMAO he isn't better than Darnold or PJ.

If they were still here he wouldn't be better than Allen,Teddy or Taylor.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChibCU Experienced

ChibCU

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, there is absolutely no question Cam is better than Sam Darnold. That's just laughable to even suggest otherwise.

Even a broken down Cam is better than Darnold.

People speaking in absolutes with no verifiable proof as if they have access to god-level, omniscient insight...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)

No reason to get that worked up about a former qb who clearly isn't coming back on a Thursday afternoon. With that said. We obviously have not had any luck with the post #1 era options and we still have no real deep passing game to speak of which is kind of ironic but it has to change soon.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

LMAO he isn't better than Darnold or PJ.

If they were still here he wouldn't be better than Allen,Teddy or Taylor.

 

 

Cam had more wins last year than the Panthers or Sam.  And the NE roster was trash.    But yeah, let’s keep skipping over that type stuff. 

Cam could literally run every down as a wildcat QB….and the outcome would be better than if you put some QBs on rosters in a game.   He is still a nightmare mismatch even if his shoulder can’t recover. 

And again the argument isn’t about Cam being the guy anywhere.  He shouldn’t be.  There is nothing to built toward with him.   He just a body at this point and too big of a personality to make sense almost anywhere.  But clearly, better than a lot of guys collecting checks.  There is some The Golden Calf of Bristol to Cam now.  When The Golden Calf of Bristol left….there weren’t 64 better QBs in the NFL in terms of finding a win for your team.  There just wasn’t a point in going the The Golden Calf of Bristol route.   There was no future there and it was too much of a circus to bring him in short term in any role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
Just now, Catsfan69 said:

Come on Man. Cam Newton is horrible now.

I don't understand this unnatural crush some of you have for him.

Again, you either don’t understand the real point or are intentionally missing the point. 

We have a roster full of guys worse than Cam present day.  That’s the problem.  It’s not an argument to sign Cam.   And someone having a stronger arm doesn’t make them a better QB.  See last season as further evidence.  

Cam Newton is still the biggest rushing mismatch in NFL history.  Which is why he ultimately is still so much better than guys.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Again, you either don’t understand the real point or are intentionally missing the point. 

We have a roster full of guys worse than Cam present day.  That’s the problem.  It’s not an argument to sign Cam.   And someone having a stronger arm doesn’t make them a better QB.  See last season as further evidence.  

Cam Newton is still the biggest rushing mismatch in NFL history.  Which is why he ultimately is still so much better than guys.  

Lol he wasn't even a prolific runner in his prime.

He was nowhere near the escape artist/runner as Vick, Lamar Jackson or hell even Russell Wilson. 

How many times did he really break off a 40 plus yard run to the house? 

He was great running for 2 yards and getting a  lot of 1 yard tds tho. That's true.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Come on Man. Cam Newton is horrible now.

I don't understand this unnatural crush some of you have for him.

I will put it this way, Sam Darnold's best season ever(currently watching it) would be Cam's worst full season in his career.

That's what I mean. Even broken down Cam is better than Darnold. 

I am not sure if you are aware but Sam Darnold has been one of the worst QB's in the NFL for four seasons running now.

It ain't about Cam, it's about Sam.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
Just now, Catsfan69 said:

Lol he wasn't even a prolific runner in his prime.

He was nowhere near the escape artist/runner as Vick, Lamar Jackson or hell even Russell Wilson. 

How many times did he really break off a 40 plus yard run to the house? 

He was great running for 2 yards and getting a  lot of 1 yard tds tho. That's true.

Billy Madison Shut Up GIF

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Lol he wasn't even a prolific runner in his prime.

He was nowhere near the escape artist/runner as Vick, Lamar Jackson or hell even Russell Wilson. 

How many times did he really break off a 40 plus yard run to the house? 

He was great running for 2 yards and getting a  lot of 1 yard tds tho. That's true.

Yes, Cam Newton is the greatest rushing threat in NFL history. 

lol.  Going the he doesn’t run like Vick/Lamar route means nothing.  No, he doesn’t run like them.  He was much more problematic.  Every run was on the table like he was a featured HB….but with the numbers edge that a QB runner brings. 

He is the greatest rushing threat because he didn’t have to run away from people.  That was the problem for defenses.  He was always at the advantage.  And there has been nothing like him and probably never will be.  Love him or hate him, he is a unicorn.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...