Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team designed around CMC. Can’t wi. Without him

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ClawOn Grand Master

ClawOn

Posted
Posted

Yes this is true. It was a gamble. We would likely be 5-1 with CMC. Other than being elite, he masks the O line weaknesses,  forces defenses to limit blitzes. 

He got hurt. Maybe he'll never play a full season again. Lost the bet. New plan next season. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted

For real someone explain the part where this offense is designed around anything or anyone...

Which picks, which moves, what? This offense is willy nilly no matter who is in. CMCs plays have been similar to Cams it's not designed or built around its "save me jeebus" and that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Well I’m sure this post will not go over well

but as a friend of mine said, the   offense is designed around CMC and without him, they can’t win

Sadly, he is right 

they won’t win until he returns 

They lean on CMC not designed , if so this is a poo design 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

They basically had a whole season without him and still don't know what to do. Hubbard is basically at the same yards per rush attempt as CMC yet we only ran 16 times today? Pretty sure 10 more rushes would have equaled at least 1 or 2 more field goals at minimum. Def on that horrible drive at the end of the 2nd I believe it was. It all kinda blurred together today

Running against the Vikes is not the same as running on the Saints. Let’s see what Hubbard does if goes up against the Bucs D.We want to get away from giving the same back 25 rushes or 30 touches a game so why should we do that with Hubbard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

No one has laid out any designs or builds....it doesn't exist.

 

Agree with you 100 percent. They new what they had in CMC in 2017 yet no investment in top o line or QB. They wanted CMC to sell tickets because Rhule is Defense minded coach and wanted to start that rebuild first. That’s why I was hoping we would have landed a more offense minded coach .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
Just now, TDGone said:

Agree with you 100 percent. They new what they had in CMC in 2017 yet no investment in top o line or QB. They wanted CMC to sell tickets because Rhule is Defense minded coach and wanted to start that rebuild first. That’s why I was hoping we would have landed a more offense minded coach .

Right it has been said but not even a remote shred of evidence that this offense is designed or built for any damn thing never mind a specific person.

1...literally one shred of evidence from OP or his friend or whoever else....simply overworking CMC isn't an offensive design or a build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, TDGone said:

Running against the Vikes is not the same as running on the Saints. Let’s see what Hubbard does if goes up against the Bucs D.We want to get away from giving the same back 25 rushes or 30 touches a game so why should we do that with Hubbard

He averaged 4 yards a carry today with no signs of slowing down. Insert whatever RB name you want but the running game was working better than the passing game so why abandon the run? Even the Vikings youtubers were saying run on them to beat them on PNP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Bryce’s new look. He looks like a grown up

      By frankw · Posted

      Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • OldhamA
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By OldhamA · Posted

      I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • strato
      Bryce’s new look. He looks like a grown up

      By strato · Posted

      I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...