Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chuba Hubbard is a NFL starter


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

The WR's are much less of a problem that our bottom of the NFL QB play(and bottom 5 OL play).

They are largely mirroring the poo around them. 

It's a sign of poor coaching. While everything isn't Brady's fault he should be coming up with ways to score more than 3 points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Snake said:

It's a sign of poor coaching. While everything isn't Brady's fault he should be coming up with ways to score more than 3 points. 

The dysfunction is bad enough that I ultimately hold Rhule mostly responsible. He hired the dude, he had last word on Darnold and he had the last word on the OL. 

Tepper made him The Guy and as The Guy, he is getting The Blame.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Zod said:

I really think Chuba is good enough to start in this league and do very well. The drop off from McCaffrey really isn't all that drastic. Most of the problem is that Chuba is open on the check down but Darnold would rather throw a pick down field. 

Chuba is a back up plain and simple he has 101 touches for 419 yards we’re CMC has 64 touches and 368 yards. Then when CMC is in he faces a lot more 8 man in the box which opened up our offense for our WR . Chuba in the game Defense never are concerned with him and that’s why the passing game has went backward.Chuba is also not great at picking up the blocking on passing downs.He might be open on. check downs but he also has dropped passes and that’s why the QB doesn’t have confidence in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuba is what he is he has potential. Two of the best factors going for him are he can actually get onto the field and he isnt the highest paid at his position. Weird but not surprising  that some people hate on him so much but still make excuses for others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TDGone said:

Chuba is a back up plain and simple he has 101 touches for 419 yards we’re CMC has 64 touches and 368 yards. Then when CMC is in he faces a lot more 8 man in the box which opened up our offense for our WR . Chuba in the game Defense never are concerned with him and that’s why the passing game has went backward.Chuba is also not great at picking up the blocking on passing downs.He might be open on. check downs but he also has dropped passes and that’s why the QB doesn’t have confidence in him.

And how many more 8 man boxes does he face?

Does anyone have real numbers on that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TDGone said:

CMC has a spy on him on most every play

Yep, and defenses game plan specifically for CMC.  No team builds a defensive game plan around facing Chuba Hubbard.  As I stated earlier, his style is suited to be a 3rd down back, however his hands utterly suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TDGone said:

CMC has a spy on him on most every play

That's a myth.

Down and distance dictates a lot of that.  3rd and 10, passing situation, of course someone is going to watch him coming out of the backfield, same would be true with most RBs.  

1st and 10, a lot of teams are going to play 8 men in the box, not because of CMC, but because its a running down and down and distance.

I'm not saying he doesn't get more attention than Hubbard but it is severely overblown by this fanbase.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McCaffrey is the single most impactful non-qb offensive player in the NFL when healthy. Hubbard is a fantastic backup and a competent starter but to say the drop off is marginal is a horrendous take.

Darnold has been bad the last few weeks but I have to think he'd look semi-competent with McCaffrey out there. Even his presence helps make receivers more open and when they're not, he's pretty much a guaranteed 10 yards on a check down play. Him being out is definitely the most undertalked about part of the Panthers slide and really can't be overstated.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AU-panther said:

That's a myth.

Down and distance dictates a lot of that.  3rd and 10, passing situation, of course someone is going to watch him coming out of the backfield, same would be true with most RBs.  

1st and 10, a lot of teams are going to play 8 men in the box, not because of CMC, but because its a running down and down and distance.

I'm not saying he doesn't get more attention than Hubbard but it is severely overblown by this fanbase.

 

 

The myth is thinking Chuba is a quality starter. Every time they interview opposing D cordinator they all talk about game planning to stop CMC never game planning to stop Chuba. The 8 men in a box CMC sees a lot more than Chuba and the stats back it up as facts. CMC 61 touches 368 yards 1 TD vs the 27th , 13th and 26th Defense. Our offense in the games 381 yards ,383 yards and 407 yards for a avg of 390 yards offense a game.This counts the Houston game for both of them. Chuba 101 touches 419 yards 1 TD vs the 26th , 23rd,17th,16th and 20th Defense . Our offense in the games 407 yards,379 yards, 267 yards , 306 yards ,173 yards for a avg of 306 yards Offense a game . The numbers tell that now Chuba is getting more attention because he’s is the starter our Offense is going backwards. This is the facts not a myth. But if we’re in rebuild we should trade CMC while he still has value .

Edited by TDGone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TDGone said:

The myth is thinking Chuba is a quality starter. Every time they interview opposing D cordinator they all talk about game planning to stop CMC never game planning to stop Chuba. The 8 men in a box CMC sees a lot more than Chuba and the stats back it up as facts. CMC 61 touches 368 yards 1 TD vs the 27th , 13th and 26th Defense. Our offense in the games 381 yards ,383 yards and 407 yards for a avg of 390 yards offense a game.This counts the Houston game for both of them. Chuba 101 touches 419 yards 1 TD vs the 26th , 23rd,17th,16th and 20th Defense . Our offense in the games 407 yards,379 yards, 267 yards , 306 yards ,173 yards for a avg of 306 yards Offense a game . The numbers tell that now Chuba is getting more attention because he’s is the starter our Offense is going backwards. This is the facts not a myth. But if we’re in rebuild we should trade CMC while he still has value .

None of those stats tell you how many are in the box. 
Watch the tape.  For identical downs and distances are teams using different alignments for Hubbard as opposed to CMC taking in to account that teams tendencies for all RBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...