Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next Steps (as considered from my toilet)


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we think there's a potential franchise QB on the board, FUGING DRAFT HIM. When you need a QB you don't have the luxury of picking and choosing the absolute perfect timing. When the opportunity presents itself you have to jump. When you're sitting through everyone else's trash can to try to find the answer at the most important position in the game, that's exactly what you're likely to find - trash.

 

For some reason I picture you being like the guy in this scene at the prospect of Howell being a Panther.

 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, mav1234 said:

When you say ride the horse out - keep starting Darnold?  I was on that train until today - I just don't get how you can keep him starting the way he has played most of the time over the last month+...

yep. i mean you can try walker out but you won''t find it's any better at all. you roll with darnold because of the investment made in him and let it be a lesson to him and everyone else involved in the decision to bring him in without taking the OL seriously or trying to get clever without the knowledge and experience needed to do something clever.

darnold needs to find out if he's got what it takes to be a starter in this league that can handle adversity (which he won't). and you let that lesson that this whole thing was a bad idea be driven into the ground all season so they don't have a chance to forget or make excuses. 

we'll suffer, but we were going to anyways. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rayzor said:

yep. i mean you can try walker out but you won''t find it's any better at all. you roll with darnold because of the investment made in him and let it be a lesson to him and everyone else involved in the decision to bring him in without taking the OL seriously or trying to get clever without the knowledge and experience needed to do something clever.

darnold needs to find out if he's got what it takes to be a starter in this league that can handle adversity (which he won't). and you let that lesson that this whole thing was a bad idea be driven into the ground all season so they don't have a chance to forget or make excuses. 

we'll suffer, but we were going to anyways. 

It's like a serial killer giving you the choice of drowning, stabbing or strangulation.  Sure there are choices, but is there really a good one?  The staff can go with PJ, shuffle the OL around yet again, tell Joe Brady to call a some more run plays, but is outcome really going to be any different?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking more immediately, we need to go back to what was our success in the first three games - quick passing game.  Spread guys out.  One of the problems we've had with packing it in for running plays is that it gave defenders a shorter route to the ball.

Rhule can say he wants to be a pound the rock team, but that's not going to happen.  If you look back at those first three games, there was more shotgun, spread, and passes that were ready when Sam dropped back.  We were also more willing to throw into that 2nd level.  This team was made to run this Joe Brady version of the Saints offense.  We don't have the big bodies to pound people into submission.

I have no idea what the future holds, but going back to what they actually spent TC doing probably won't be worse than what we're seeing now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are keeping Rhule and Fitts after this offsrason then Tepper needs to hire someone over them both. This staff is so inexperienced another year without making a big move like that just doesn't look like enough to get them up to speed.

Go get an old hand and put him in charge, there isn't anyone employed by the team currently with enough meaningful experience to dig them out of the hole the have created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

at this point it doesn't look like there is a QB we should take in the draft this year, and the best 2 or 3 will probably be taken before our pick anyway.

I like the idea of getting Fitz or Tyrod.  So spend our draft and FA building the line and hope we can find a long term  QB in 2023.  Sucks but that's what happens when you don't have a QB.  They are hard to find.

Consistently overlooked by this coach. Marty wanted to try and get Justin Herbert. Coach said no. The last one was Justin Fields, although not perfect would have ignited and excited the fans with hope for the future. Nope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...