Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam removed from banner inside BOA?


therealmjl
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cam is being blocked by a podium and a speaker. You can see that in the banner too, it's just cropped a bit.  Take a look above - that's the original photo and you can see it at https://www.panthers.com/news/panthers-receive-nfc-championship-rings-17235426 ....

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

The question is was the photo cropped or is he just not fully in the original anyways. 

He's not in the original.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, firefox1234 said:

They chose a weird angle that conveniently left our MVP out…

Well, you can argue why that picture was chosen (shirts, a number of players, celebrating etc)... I would have included a picture with Cam but that is fundamentally different from saying they are cropping him out of pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, firefox1234 said:

But the issue still remains. Where is our MVP?

Dude. Whoever took the picture appears to have done so from where they were standing, there is a podium and a person blocking Cam.  Nothing sinister here as much as you may want to believe it. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Well, you can argue why that picture was chosen (shirts, a number of players, celebrating etc)... I would have included a picture with Cam but that is fundamentally different from saying they are cropping him out of pictures.

 

5 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

But the issue still remains. Where is our MVP?

I would not put it past them that they chose that picture for the banner because it has BOA in it. It’s a weird photo to begin with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sir Purr said:

Dude. Whoever took the picture appears to have done so from where they were standing, there is a podium and a person blocking Cam.  Nothing sinister here as much as you may want to believe it. LOL

Okay. A picture that does not have our MVP was used as our banner instead of one that also included him which I’m sure isn’t hard to find.

the question remains, where is our MVP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...