Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB or OL? Hypothetical qestion


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I had the 2021 class as this:

Elite

1. Lawrence

2. Lance

Near Elite

3. Fields

High Risk Gamble

4. Wilson

Low Ceiling, High Floor

5. Jones

 

I definitely was much higher on Lance than almost anyone. 

So you would only draft a QB in a loaded year when you have a top 3 pick?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Loved Lance, Josh Allen vibes. That price tag tho is a back breaker. 

Oh yeah. Plus....the more I dug into him the more he seemed like a hard working guy with a MAJOR chip on his shoulder that caused him to dig deep to be better.

I just think he will work really hard to keep improving every day.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

So you would only draft a QB in a loaded year when you have a top 3 pick?

 

No, I would have taken any of those top 4 in the top 10. Jones I would have considered in the 15 and lower range. He just wasn't high on my board.

I think Wilson will end up being the biggest risk guy and Jones will be better than expected. TBD, I mean these guys are in the infancy of their careers.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me the frustrating thing, yes this is hindsight, .... is I was ok they passed on Fields and Jones.  To me the fact Denver who also desperately needed a QB and picked right after the Panthers also passed on them was somewhat telling and I was ok not going in that direction. 

THE part in hindsight that I think was the mistake, was not drafting Slater to play LT.  So now the Panthers still need to address QB and LT with no 2nd round pick ... so it will be almost impossible to address both in the next draft.  If they went Slater and not Horne, at least the LT spot would have resolved.  Now again, it will take most likely another two drafts to address both positions and that stinks.  Unless of course they trade future draft capital which also stinks.  🤦‍♂️

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, grateflday said:

To me the frustrating thing, yes this is hindsight, .... is I was ok they passed on Fields and Jones.  To me the fact Denver who also desperately needed a QB and picked right after the Panthers also passed on them was somewhat telling and I was ok not going in that direction. 

THE part in hindsight that I think was the mistake, was not drafting Slater to play LT.  So now the Panthers still need to address QB and LT with no 2nd round pick ... so it will be almost impossible to address both in the next draft.  If they went Slater and not Horne, at least the LT spot would have resolved.  Now again, it will take most likely another two drafts to address both positions and that stinks.  Unless of course they trade future draft capital which also stinks.  🤦‍♂️

Honestly, Slater+Cosmi could of been our R1+2.  That's a pair of linemen right there for an offensive rebuild.  I love Marshall's potential but I don't know if it really made sense with the line to build.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a generational talent in Cam and we still never had back to back winning seasons because we never addressed the line as a priority.  Let that sink in.   Not only did we not have back to back winning seasons we ended his career prematurely because we failed to protect him.  I honest to God dont understand how you guys are not seeing this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We had a generational talent in Cam and we still never had back to back winning seasons because we never addressed the line as a priority.  Let that sink in.   Not only did we not have back to back winning seasons we ended his career prematurely because we failed to protect him.  I honest to God dont understand how you guys are not seeing this.

It’s not us that’s the problem. Our highly paid braintrust who haven’t figured it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...