Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton (Reactions, Love & Positivity)


CarolinaLivin
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

It’s so different seeing people love him now like we loved him since been lovin him.

Well those are paid network analysts and such. The fan love has always been there and never changed. But the narrative was we dropped cam because he no longer had the talent and was washed. Now he comes back healthy when the team "needs him". Its a storyline. NFL makes money off storylines and narratives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we got rid of Cam before, he was broken, our team was broken and we'd just hired a new head coach who has no idea of assessing pro level players.

Cam healed up, went to the mountain and studied with a guru.

Our coach got in deeper water than he could handle. He called Cam.

Cam came back and healed the fanbase. It's going to take a new coach and GM to  fix the team, though. We have good parts, but they aren't assembled well or directed properly.

Hire experienced conultants. New coach, new GM. Keep Cam for two more years, get his input on his successor and have him train him  up. Build the team based on that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

When we got rid of Cam before, he was broken, our team was broken and we'd just hired a new head coach who has no idea of assessing pro level players.

Cam healed up, went to the mountain and studied with a guru.

Our coach got in deeper water than he could handle. He called Cam.

Cam came back and healed the fanbase. It's going to take a new coach and GM to  fix the team, though. We have good parts, but they aren't assembled well or directed properly.

Hire experienced conultants. New coach, new GM. Keep Cam for two more years, get his input on his successor and have him train him  up. Build the team based on that. 

I don't think the fanbase is completely healed, but it's on it's way.  I think it'll be healed once we finally bring in a galvanizing coach.

Edited by TheMaulClaw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...