Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Missing a true deep threat.


TheMaulClaw
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Prowler2k18 said:

I think Rhule understands that based on our offensive limitations e.g. below average OL, shaky QB situation, etc., playing a conservative style offense is our best chance to win this year. We weren’t nearly as conservative last year and once these issues get addressed, we should get back to a pro style offense. JMO

But I don't think he's tailoring the offense to personnel. Inversely, I think he is tailoring the personnel to what he thinks a winning offense should play like, and has been trying to do so since he got here.

Look at the QBs he brought in.  Those were his guys.  I have watched every post game presser and most Monday pressers this season, and Rhule has repeatedly said winning football is controlling the line of scrimmage and running the ball.  He has specifically stated and emphasized the "running the ball" part.  Pair those ideals with who he believed could quarterback the offense and it's clear he wants to rely on the defense while minimizing mistakes and controlling the clock on offense, regardless of what other personnel we field.  Teddy was always a game manager.  Sam's best case-scenario was a game manager.  And that's why I believe he didn't want Cam but was forced to bring him back - Cam makes plays himself and doesn't fit the mold of the two other guys in that he doesn't need to rely on 10 other guys to carry him to a win.  That is a specific style suited for ball control offenses...  runs, dump downs, checkdowns, etc., and let the skill position guys make plays after the handoff or catch and eat up clock.  That's what Rhule really wants.

He said himself Sunday that he was completely satisfied with 7 yards per attempted pass.  And judging from what we see every Sunday, it doesn't appear we design any passes where the deep route is the first read in the progression...  it doesn't jibe with Rhule's idea of winning football, so we don't do it.

I also think that's why Brady hasn't been fired.  He's trying to do what Rhule wants, he just sucks at his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Robby Anderson was considered a one trick pony as a deep threat when we initially brought him in.

 

I haven't seen him even get open this year. When he does he drops it.  I don't think he commands so much respect where he forces opposing safeties to play deep. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well every one bitches and moaned about completion percentage etc etc nowadays so now that we run this dink and dunk stuff we miss the deep shots we are accustomed to vintage cam delivering.

I’m done with Brady and this offense he’s running, very bland and basic, nothing innovative nothing schemed to take advantage of teams weaknesses.

I’ll give credit for even being able to get the plays he’s ran with cam in in such short notice, but what Robby said about teams knowing our plays seems to hold some truth 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, trueblade said:

I have to push back on this idea. Since Cam's return, we've been very good in the red zone.

Okay but you can’t run with Cam in the red zone every time. You got to have a guy with size. People forgot Olsen scored around 60 TDs here and size and reach was a lot of it. Even Benjamin had 20-25 TDs here. Not even gonna start on Moose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...